Update dev team documentation

[gonuke]

Describe the Bug

Current dev_team.rst does not include all contributors

To Reproduce

Compare information in docs/dev_team.rst to data in https://github.com/pyne/pyne/graphs/contributors.

Expected Behavior

Documented dev team should include all contributors.

[shimwell]

If this is being redone then we could consider moving to a new format.

I think GitHub in general is now moving to a CITATION.cff file in the root folder of the repo. Then it gets picked up by GitHub and generates automatic citation text for latex etc.

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-citation-files

We have such a file on the DAGMC repo as a example https://github.com/svalinn/DAGMC/blob/develop/CITATION.cff

[bam241]

@shimwell do you know how the order is determined? Is it random?

It feels wrong to have my name first on a DAGMC contributor list ;)

[shimwell]

@bam241 it was sorted by commits. You are also top of this list https://github.com/svalinn/DAGMC/graphs/contributors

[bam241]

I feel like number of commits are a flowed flawed metric...

I cannot claim by far that as I am one of the main contributor of DAGMC

[shimwell]

Other easy options (GitHub has a drop down menu for) are lines added, lines deleted.

I think commits is the default as some repos squash the commits when merging a PR.

[gonuke]

This is still manually maintained, right? So it means new contributors should add their name to this file? (Could we test for that?)

[gonuke]

Author ordering is complex and probably deserves a community discussion/policy

[gonuke]

I'm not sure that CITATION.cff should necessarily supersede up-to-date documentation on who has contributed, unless one can be automatically generated from the other?