We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm using the get_data() function from pyexcel_xls and pyexcel_odsr with .xls and .ods tables similar to this:
get_data()
pyexcel_xls
pyexcel_odsr
pyexcel_xls.get_data() reads the table as follows, with an empty string in the second row:
pyexcel_xls.get_data()
[['One', 'Two', 'Three', 'Four'] ['One', 'Two and three', '', 'Four']]
On the other hand, pyexcel_ods.get_data() reads the table as follows, with no empty string:
pyexcel_ods.get_data()
[['One', 'Two', 'Three', 'Four'] ['One', 'Two and three', 'Four']]
ie, there is no way to acknowledge the existence of a merged cell in the second row.
Is there any way to make both libraries behave the same way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I'm using the
get_data()
function frompyexcel_xls
andpyexcel_odsr
with .xls and .ods tables similar to this:pyexcel_xls.get_data()
reads the table as follows, with an empty string in the second row:On the other hand,
pyexcel_ods.get_data()
reads the table as follows, with no empty string:ie, there is no way to acknowledge the existence of a merged cell in the second row.
Is there any way to make both libraries behave the same way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: