Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MQMQA support: B-type excess mixing parameters #403

Open
bocklund opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

MQMQA support: B-type excess mixing parameters #403

bocklund opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@bocklund
Copy link
Collaborator

MQMQA models in the DAT format can have mixing code Q, G, or B that correspond to different excess equations. Right now Q and G are implemented in ModelMQMQA.excess_energy, but mixing code B is not yet supported.

@maxposchmann
Copy link

maxposchmann commented May 12, 2022

Note that R ('reciprocal') is also a possible mixing code.

@bocklund
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note that R ('reciprocal') is also a possible mixing code.

Do you know the mathematical form of B and R parameters or a reference where I can find them? Our current implementation was heavily influenced by your recent paper and the friendly notation within 😄

@maxposchmann
Copy link

R specifies two constituents from each sublattice (i.e. two cations A,B and two anions X,Y). I've only ever seen it all 0 exponents, so Δg_ab/xy = L_AB/XY X_AB/XY. Probably the exponents act on the constituent fractions (i.e X_A), but as I said I've never seen them used. Not surprising, it's hard enough to find and fit data for reciprocal systems.

@maxposchmann
Copy link

maxposchmann commented May 13, 2022

B is Bragg-Williams mixing. Pelton's textbook is probably the best reference for you.

While looking at Thermochimica to see what pointers I could give, I was reminded that H is also a possible code, and also refers to Bragg-Williams mixing.

From FactSage, here's a B term:
bragg-williams_B

and here's an H term:
bragg-williams_H

Take these with a grain of salt, as the solution module that displays these often glosses over important details, and is occasionally outright incorrect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants