Is it possible to have more records per page? #485
Replies: 7 comments 2 replies
-
Glad to hear you've been using this software for so long. It is possible to control the item per page using the option |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I changed that setting, which worked as you said. Thanks for your reply.
Another question: For each DNS record, the edit and delete boxes are stacked over/under rather than side by side. I am working with a high-resolution laptop screen. This forces each record to use two lines instead of one (the second line only contains the ‘Delete’ box, and nothing else).
If the boxes were side by side, the records could fit onto one line and more would be visible at one time - more ‘record density’ per page. Is there another setting I could adjust to put each record on one line instead of consuming two lines?
Off-topic Comment: I am not a Linux user. I use poweradmin in FreeBSD jails, and it works smoothly. Very easy to install and maintain.
… On Jan 5, 2023, at 2:16 AM, Edmondas Girkantas ***@***.***> wrote:
Glad to hear you've been using this software for so long.
It is possible to control the item per page using the option $iface_rowamount, but this is global setting. Future plans include the ability for users to select items on each page themselves.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#485 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7KBT57HLSD6BZQFDPM24TWQZ7PBANCNFSM6AAAAAATRMBM5A>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Would it be possible to provide a screenshot with anonymized data for better understanding? In the last version, I tried to address this, but there might have been places where I overlooked it. By the way, FreeBSD is a really nice operating system, I used it a lot in the past because of its simplicity and power. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As requested. Hope this help! I have tried adjusting screen resolutions, etc. The Edit/Delete boxes remain ’stacked’ rather than 'side-by-side'.
By the way, the list of domains does NOT have this problem. The domain name list has the Edit and Delete. boxes side by side. Good work!
Tom
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here’s another try as sending you the screenshot:

As for which php script causes this behavior, I am afraid I do not know. This screenshot comes from the list of records for a particular domain. Other domains look the same.
Interestingly, the page showing the domain list does NOT put the Edit and Delete boxes above and below on two separate lines. Instead, the Edit and Delete boxes are side-by-side. This makes the Zone List page more efficient - one line per zone (domain) rather than two.
I can try to transmit the image another way if this attempt fails.
Tom
… On Jan 7, 2023, at 5:03 AM, Edmondas Girkantas ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm not sure why the screenshot isn't available, so maybe you can specify which php script is responsible for this incorrect behavior (edit, edit_record or other)?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#485 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7KBT3F4CHDZCWY4JDQJQTWRFEOLANCNFSM6AAAAAATRMBM5A>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The edit.html file has been modified (check line 107) -2c42e7a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you👍Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 8, 2023, at 1:00 PM, Edmondas Girkantas ***@***.***> wrote:
The edit.html file has been modified (check line 107) -2c42e7a
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have been a user of poweradmin for about 6 years. Thank you very much for keeping it alive!
In one domain, I have 120 records. With older versions (say, 2.2.2), the entire list spanned three pages and was easy to scan/review/edit. The newest version 3.4.0 looks great, and I appreciate the improvements 'under the hood'. However, 120 records takes 13 pages - The most my web browser showed was 10 records per page. Could you add an option to enable selection for the number of records per page? I really appreciated the record density of the older versions.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions