Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of babel-eslint is breaking the build 🚨 #93

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

An in-range update of babel-eslint is breaking the build 🚨 #93

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 20, 2017

Version 7.2.0 of babel-eslint just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency babel-eslint
Current Version 7.1.1
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As babel-eslint is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪


Status Details
  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build failed Details
Release Notes v7.2.0

New Feature

  • Add option to disable code frame. (#446) (Luís Couto)

Main change is just an option to disable the codeframe (added in v7.1.1) for html output and more (thanks to @Couto).

{
  "parser": "babel-eslint",
  "parserOptions": {
    "codeFrame": false
  },
  "extends": "eslint:recommended"
}

Bug Fix

  • [flow] Process polymorphic type bounds on functions (#444) (Alex Rattray)

Internal/Docs

  • Use lodash instead of lodash.pickby. (#435) (wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg)
  • Updates ESLint version/remove unnecessary config (Kai Cataldo)
  • Remove broken ESLint tests (Kai Cataldo)
  • Upgrade outdated dependencies (Kai Cataldo)
  • remove deprecated rule examples [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • update readme [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 6.0.0 (#433) (Henry Zhu)
  • Update to use Node 4 features (#425) (Nazim Hajidin)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 4.0.0 (#430) (greenkeeper[bot])
  • add badges [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • Revert "use *" (#426) (Henry Zhu)
  • use * (#421) (Henry Zhu)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 3.0.0 (#423) (greenkeeper[bot])
Commits

The new version differs by 17 commits .

  • 4db4db5 7.2.0
  • 4499412 Use lodash instead of lodash.pickby. (#435)
  • a2c3b30 [flow] Process polymorphic type bounds on functions (#444)
  • 515adef Add option to disable code frame. (#446)
  • ce66e73 Merge pull request #447 from kaicataldo/clean-up-eslint
  • b49ab20 Updates ESLint version/remove unnecessary config
  • 702d6b8 Remove broken ESLint tests
  • 6b4c4ca Upgrade outdated dependencies
  • bdeb86f remove deprecated rule examples [skip ci]
  • 52b4a13 update readme [skip ci]
  • 0e5aca3 chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 6.0.0 (#433)
  • 781dc77 Update to use Node 4 features (#425)
  • 265d219 chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 4.0.0 (#430)
  • e6af5c5 add badges [skip ci]
  • a91a9d0 Revert "use *" (#426)

There are 17 commits in total. See the full diff.

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Mar 23, 2017

Version 7.2.1 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • 3cda62e 7.2.1
  • 5626de1 Remove left over eslint 2 estraverse code (#452)
  • b5fb53b Fix type param and interface declaration scoping (#449)
  • f1cee0f Remove lodash dependency (#450)
  • eb05812 Format non-regression errors for legibility (#451)
  • 7972a05 Update README.md with codeFrame option (#448)

See the full diff.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 12, 2017

Version 7.2.2 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Release Notes v7.2.2

v7.2.2


  • Fix: use eslint-scope instead of escope if present (#461) (Vitor Balocco)
  • Separate finding peer deps from monkeypatching (#460) (Andres Suarez)
  • Remove unused .gitmodules (#457) (Andres Suarez)
  • Use dedent for unpadding (#456) (Andres Suarez)
  • Enable strict mode in all of babylon-to-espree (Andres Suarez)
  • Move ast convert steps to babylon-to-espree (Andres Suarez)
  • Use for-loop for template literal conversion (Andres Suarez)
  • Only iterate over tokens once (Andres Suarez)
  • Inline fixDirectives and use for-loop (Andres Suarez)
  • Consolidate versions of "convertComments" (Andres Suarez)
  • toAst pass "source" in state instead of keeping in scope (Andres Suarez)
  • Add type parameter scope tests (#454) (Andres Suarez)
Commits

The new version differs by 14 commits .

  • f59d200 7.2.2
  • 8622009 Fix: use eslint-scope instead of escope if present (#461)
  • 0f611b8 Separate finding peer deps from monkeypatching (#460)
  • 1201e12 Remove unused .gitmodules (#457)
  • a750684 Use dedent for unpadding (#456)
  • cdb92fe Merge pull request #455 from babel/babylon-to-espree-tidy
  • ec14787 Enable strict mode in all of babylon-to-espree
  • 6c5beec Move ast convert steps to babylon-to-espree
  • d2ce789 Use for-loop for template literal conversion
  • 539af05 Only iterate over tokens once
  • 06c3a31 Inline fixDirectives and use for-loop
  • 5d32ad0 Consolidate versions of "convertComments"
  • 2541fc9 toAst pass "source" in state instead of keeping in scope
  • 21dac73 Add type parameter scope tests (#454)

See the full diff.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 21, 2017

Version 7.2.3 just got published.

Your tests are passing again with this version. Explicitly upgrade to this version 🚀

Commits

The new version differs by 2 commits0.

false

See the full diff

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants