You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is related to, and may be irrelevant once resolved by #8 (headbgcolor and colbgcolor should not be affected by colsep).
The natural column width is determined by the widest column value, whether that's the header or one of the rows. That same column width should be applied to both headbgcolor and colbgcolor, but it is currently not being applied to colbgcolor.
In the example below, the "Date" header is padded—as expected—by the longer "2023-07-28" values, but the wider "Column 2" header is not reflected in the padding of shorter version numbers like "1.0.0". The same is true with column 1 row values.
I'm looking at this as part of general maintenance caused by changes to the colored package. What behavior do you want to see? Should the colsep space have bgcolor? Should only the unpadded text have bgcolor?
This issue is related to, and may be irrelevant once resolved by #8 (headbgcolor and colbgcolor should not be affected by colsep).
The natural column width is determined by the widest column value, whether that's the header or one of the rows. That same column width should be applied to both
headbgcolor
andcolbgcolor
, but it is currently not being applied tocolbgcolor
.In the example below, the "Date" header is padded—as expected—by the longer "2023-07-28" values, but the wider "Column 2" header is not reflected in the padding of shorter version numbers like "1.0.0". The same is true with column 1 row values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: