Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New syntax needed for interlaced arrays (aka tables) #30

Open
dirk-zimoch opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

New syntax needed for interlaced arrays (aka tables) #30

dirk-zimoch opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dirk-zimoch
Copy link
Member

At the moment, there is no good way to parse interlaced arrays:
a[0],b[0],c[0];a[1],b[1],c[1];a[2],b[2],b[3];...
And there is not even a bad way to print them.
How should the syntax look like?
I am inclined to this:
in "possible prefix" [ "%f,%(recB)f,%(recC)f;" ] "possible postfix";
having [ outside of quotes.
Or escaped: "[...]" ?
When to stop if the array records differ in capacity (NELM)? First record to fill up and leave the remaining input in the input buffer? Last record to fill up and drop overflow elements? End of matching input and drop overflow elements?

@dirk-zimoch dirk-zimoch changed the title New syntax needed for interlaced arrays New syntax needed for interlaced arrays (aka tables) Feb 22, 2019
@dirk-zimoch dirk-zimoch self-assigned this Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant