Linting swift code does not work. Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint' #440

r3econ · 2021-04-29T11:32:29Z

Describe the bug

Linting swift code does not work. The error appears:

...
Status: Downloaded newer image for norionomura/swiftlint:latest
The `swiftlint autocorrect` command is no longer available.
Please use `swiftlint --fix` instead.
Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint'
Correcting Swift files at paths /tmp/lint

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

Follow the quick start CLI to add mega-linter to the iOS Swift project
Accept default values (except one case where you choose that it's a Swift project)
Push to the repo, create a PR to trigger the GitHub Action
See swift-lint error (not related to the codebase)

Expected behavior

swift-lint starts linting the code base.

Screenshots

Contents of ERROR-SWIFT_SWIFTLINT.log

Results of swiftlint linter (version 0.43.1)
See documentation on https://nvuillam.github.io/mega-linter/descriptors/swift_swiftlint/
-----------------------------------------------

❌ [ERROR] for workspace /github/workspace
Linter raw log:
Unable to find image 'norionomura/swiftlint:latest' locally
latest: Pulling from norionomura/swiftlint
34667c7e4631: Pulling fs layer
d18d76a881a4: Pulling fs layer
119c7358fbfc: Pulling fs layer
2aaf13f3eff0: Pulling fs layer
969975223755: Pulling fs layer
1ea85296b57d: Pulling fs layer
178f29677290: Pulling fs layer
5f015d65fccd: Pulling fs layer
2aaf13f3eff0: Waiting
969975223755: Waiting
1ea85296b57d: Waiting
178f29677290: Waiting
5f015d65fccd: Waiting
d18d76a881a4: Verifying Checksum
d18d76a881a4: Download complete
119c7358fbfc: Verifying Checksum
119c7358fbfc: Download complete
2aaf13f3eff0: Verifying Checksum
2aaf13f3eff0: Download complete
1ea85296b57d: Verifying Checksum
1ea85296b57d: Download complete
34667c7e4631: Verifying Checksum
34667c7e4631: Download complete
5f015d65fccd: Verifying Checksum
5f015d65fccd: Download complete
969975223755: Verifying Checksum
969975223755: Download complete
34667c7e4631: Pull complete
178f29677290: Verifying Checksum
178f29677290: Download complete
d18d76a881a4: Pull complete
119c7358fbfc: Pull complete
2aaf13f3eff0: Pull complete
969975223755: Pull complete
1ea85296b57d: Pull complete
178f29677290: Pull complete
5f015d65fccd: Pull complete
Digest: sha256:2b118a4b74998159c4aa3cd3ccf6d73074bec6ad70cfab0be28f4459754a0640
Status: Downloaded newer image for norionomura/swiftlint:latest
The `swiftlint autocorrect` command is no longer available.
Please use `swiftlint --fix` instead.
Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint'
Correcting Swift files at paths /tmp/lint

Contents of .swiftlint.yml

excluded: # paths to ignore during linting. Takes precedence over `included`.
  - Pods

disabled_rules: # rule identifiers to exclude from running
  - force_cast
  - force_try # Remove when done
  - type_name
  - identifier_name
  - type_body_length
  - file_length

cyclomatic_complexity:
  ignores_case_statements: true

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

r3econ · 2021-05-10T07:23:29Z

Is there anyone able to help with this?

nvuillam · 2021-05-10T16:48:58Z

@r3econ I can, but i have a lot of work for the job i'm actually paid for, but I promise I'll try to solve that in y available free time :)
If someone else want to give it a try before that, it would be very welcome of course !

r3econ · 2021-05-14T14:09:15Z

I could also try to solve it but I'd need some hints. Do you know what is causing the problem there, where to start looking?.

nvuillam · 2021-05-14T17:32:27Z

You could try to replace --fix by autocorrect in the swift descriptor cli_lint_fix_arg, maybe it would solve the issue

nvuillam · 2021-05-15T20:23:36Z

@r3econ i made the update I suggested, the test case passes, but please you check if it works with latest/insiders version ? ( not V4) and close the issue if it is fixed ?

r3econ · 2021-05-17T10:00:39Z

Thanks a lot! I tested, changed the action invocation in the workflow to use the latest tag like in the screenshot below.

However, I'm still getting the same error ErrCorrecting Swift files at paths /tmp/lint or: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint'. Am I testing it correctly? I'm using the swift flavor.

Contents of ERROR-SWIFT_SWIFTLINT.log:

Results of swiftlint linter (version 0.43.1)
See documentation on https://nvuillam.github.io/mega-linter/descriptors/swift_swiftlint/
-----------------------------------------------

❌ [ERROR] for workspace /github/workspace
Linter raw log:
Unable to find image 'norionomura/swiftlint:latest' locally
latest: Pulling from norionomura/swiftlint
34667c7e4631: Pulling fs layer
d18d76a881a4: Pulling fs layer
119c7358fbfc: Pulling fs layer
2aaf13f3eff0: Pulling fs layer
969975223755: Pulling fs layer
1ea85296b57d: Pulling fs layer
178f29677290: Pulling fs layer
5f015d65fccd: Pulling fs layer
969975223755: Waiting
1ea85296b57d: Waiting
178f29677290: Waiting
5f015d65fccd: Waiting
2aaf13f3eff0: Waiting
119c7358fbfc: Verifying Checksum
119c7358fbfc: Download complete
d18d76a881a4: Verifying Checksum
d18d76a881a4: Download complete
2aaf13f3eff0: Verifying Checksum
2aaf13f3eff0: Download complete
1ea85296b57d: Verifying Checksum
1ea85296b57d: Download complete
34667c7e4631: Verifying Checksum
34667c7e4631: Download complete
5f015d65fccd: Verifying Checksum
5f015d65fccd: Download complete
969975223755: Verifying Checksum
969975223755: Download complete
34667c7e4631: Pull complete
178f29677290: Verifying Checksum
178f29677290: Download complete
d18d76a881a4: Pull complete
119c7358fbfc: Pull complete
2aaf13f3eff0: Pull complete
969975223755: Pull complete
1ea85296b57d: Pull complete
178f29677290: Pull complete
5f015d65fccd: Pull complete
Digest: sha256:2b118a4b74998159c4aa3cd3ccf6d73074bec6ad70cfab0be28f4459754a0640
Status: Downloaded newer image for norionomura/swiftlint:latest
ErrCorrecting Swift files at paths /tmp/lint
or: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint'

nvuillam · 2021-05-17T10:02:31Z

To be honest, switft linting has been tested only from Mega-Linter test cases, so the error you see is probably a real bug and not a mistake from you

Do you have a public repo where I could reproduce the problem ?

github-actions · 2021-06-17T00:33:27Z

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

If you think this issue should stay open, please remove the O: stale 🤖 label or comment on the issue.

nvuillam · 2021-07-01T13:37:51Z

not stale

github-actions · 2021-08-01T00:39:58Z

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

If you think this issue should stay open, please remove the O: stale 🤖 label or comment on the issue.

github-actions · 2021-09-01T00:38:14Z

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

If you think this issue should stay open, please remove the O: stale 🤖 label or comment on the issue.

goncalo-frade-iohk · 2022-08-10T14:35:48Z

@nvuillam this is still happening. I believe the problem is with the paths: SwiftLint lint --path '/tmp/lint' this path should be the GitHub action repo workspace. Is there any way to change this path on the configurations?

goncalo-frade-iohk · 2022-08-17T09:06:12Z

Any suggestion around this? :)

nvuillam · 2022-08-17T09:53:06Z

It seems that swiftlint is the weak spot of MegaLinter... it indeed needs to be repaired, I'll try to succeed that someday:)

nvuillam · 2022-08-17T09:56:51Z

I just made an attempt... let's see what CI says ^^

goncalo-frade-iohk · 2022-08-17T10:08:07Z

Sure if you need any help. :) As far as I understand the problem is with the path passed down to SwiftLint SwiftLint lint --path '/tmp/lint' Im not sure what is in this folder. But if you would change for the workspace path of the GitHub action it should work.

nvuillam · 2022-08-17T10:21:29Z

If you had an example of a full docker run command with swiftlint image it would help a lot :)

goncalo-frade-iohk · 2022-08-17T10:29:55Z

Well there is this GitHub action that I know works that also uses docker :).

https://github.com/norio-nomura/action-swiftlint

And this as the entrypoint:
https://github.com/norio-nomura/action-swiftlint/blob/master/entrypoint.sh

But don't know if this can help you.

Megalinter doesnt work well with swiftlint. This issue has been reported in the ticket below. While a solution is not provided we will go forward with having this swiftlint action and disable the megalinter swiftlint process. oxsecurity/megalinter#440

Megalinter doesnt work well with swiftlint. This issue has been reported in the ticket below. While a solution is not provided we will go forward with having this swiftlint action and disable the megalinter swiftlint process. oxsecurity/megalinter#440 Fixes ATL-1640

github-actions · 2022-09-17T01:24:19Z

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

If you think this issue should stay open, please remove the O: stale 🤖 label or comment on the issue.

keithrfung · 2023-06-14T18:27:24Z

This isn't stale and is still currently happening.

nvuillam · 2023-06-18T08:02:06Z

Reopened.... any help will be appreciated :)

github-actions · 2023-07-19T02:04:06Z

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.
It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.

If you think this issue should stay open, please remove the O: stale 🤖 label or comment on the issue.

Megalinter doesnt work well with swiftlint. This issue has been reported in the ticket below. While a solution is not provided we will go forward with having this swiftlint action and disable the megalinter swiftlint process. oxsecurity/megalinter#440 Fixes ATL-1640 Signed-off-by: goncalo-frade-iohk <goncalo.frade@iohk.io>

r3econ added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 29, 2021

nvuillam mentioned this issue May 15, 2021

Fix swiftlint #467

Merged

nvuillam closed this as completed in #467 May 15, 2021

nvuillam reopened this May 15, 2021

github-actions bot added the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Jun 17, 2021

github-actions bot closed this as completed Jul 1, 2021

nvuillam reopened this Jul 1, 2021

github-actions bot removed the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Jul 1, 2021

github-actions bot added the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Aug 1, 2021

nvuillam removed the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Aug 1, 2021

github-actions bot added the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Sep 1, 2021

github-actions bot closed this as completed Sep 16, 2021

nvuillam reopened this Aug 10, 2022

github-actions bot removed the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Aug 11, 2022

nvuillam mentioned this issue Aug 17, 2022

Fix swiftlint #1757

Open

goncalo-frade-iohk mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2022

ci: [ATL-1640] add swiftlint input-output-hk/atala-prism-wallet-sdk-swift#5

Merged

github-actions bot added the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Sep 17, 2022

github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 1, 2022

Kurt-von-Laven mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2022

Issue in TYPESCRIPT-ES when using mega-lint-runner #1572

Closed

nvuillam reopened this Jun 18, 2023

github-actions bot removed the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Jun 19, 2023

github-actions bot added the O: stale 🤖 This issue or pull request is stale, it will be closed if there is no activity label Jul 19, 2023

r3econ closed this as completed Jul 24, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Linting swift code does not work. Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint' #440

Linting swift code does not work. Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint' #440

r3econ commented Apr 29, 2021

r3econ commented May 10, 2021

nvuillam commented May 10, 2021

r3econ commented May 14, 2021

nvuillam commented May 14, 2021 •

edited

nvuillam commented May 15, 2021

r3econ commented May 17, 2021

nvuillam commented May 17, 2021 •

edited

github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2021

nvuillam commented Jul 1, 2021

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2021

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2021

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 10, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2022

keithrfung commented Jun 14, 2023

nvuillam commented Jun 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2023

Linting swift code does not work. Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint' #440

Linting swift code does not work. Error: No lintable files found at paths: '/tmp/lint' #440

Comments

r3econ commented Apr 29, 2021

r3econ commented May 10, 2021

nvuillam commented May 10, 2021

r3econ commented May 14, 2021

nvuillam commented May 14, 2021 • edited

nvuillam commented May 15, 2021

r3econ commented May 17, 2021

nvuillam commented May 17, 2021 • edited

github-actions bot commented Jun 17, 2021

nvuillam commented Jul 1, 2021

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2021

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2021

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 10, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

nvuillam commented Aug 17, 2022

goncalo-frade-iohk commented Aug 17, 2022

github-actions bot commented Sep 17, 2022

keithrfung commented Jun 14, 2023

nvuillam commented Jun 18, 2023

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2023

nvuillam commented May 14, 2021 •

edited

nvuillam commented May 17, 2021 •

edited