Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[a11y] 9.2.4.6 Meaningful headings and labels #10734

Open
3 tasks
tschiebel opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks

[a11y] 9.2.4.6 Meaningful headings and labels #10734

tschiebel opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Priority:p3-medium Normal priority Topic:Accessibility Type:Bug Something isn't working

Comments

@tschiebel
Copy link

audit: https://infinite.owncloud.com/s/PnaAukHGGsLnrMM

https://bitvtest.de/pruefschritt/bitv-20-web/bitv-20-web-9-2-4-6-aussagekraeftige-ueberschriften-und-beschriftungen

Personal

  • There are several "h4" headings in the "Approvals" area, all of which have the same
    title "Link". This can be confusing for users. To create a clear and unambiguous
    structure, it is recommended that the titles be adapted accordingly,
    for example "Link 1", "Link 2", etc.

Shares

  • See commentary on Personal

Spaces

  • Members" areas - "See commentary on Personal"
@tschiebel tschiebel added Type:Bug Something isn't working Priority:p3-medium Normal priority Topic:Accessibility labels Apr 5, 2024
@pascalwengerter
Copy link
Contributor

Open to suggestions on how to solve this (esp. for existing shares), since we create the link share with the translated but hardcoded name "Link" in

@pascalwengerter
Copy link
Contributor

@tbsbdr assigning you for RE/specification

@pascalwengerter
Copy link
Contributor

@tschiebel FYI "Freigaben" is (I assume) accidentially translated to "Approvals", but should refer to "Shares"

@tbsbdr
Copy link
Contributor

tbsbdr commented Apr 11, 2024

this is meant (screenshot)
thinking aloud how this could be solved:
we once thought about enumerating links (link 1, link 2 etc.) but decided against it, because its misleading if links get deleted "it says link 4, but where is link 3?". we could add a date time but then it would get really verbose and the ui would get really cluttered. any other ideas?
screenshot_002552

@pascalwengerter
Copy link
Contributor

Agreed with @tbsbdr that we'll count the existing links and pass it to link creation, so we'll create Link ($number) in the backend (according to the behaviour in the old web UI, see e.g. https://demo.owncloud.com/apps/files/)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority:p3-medium Normal priority Topic:Accessibility Type:Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants