Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LAI for ployploid #83

Closed
Jiny000 opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

LAI for ployploid #83

Jiny000 opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@Jiny000
Copy link

Jiny000 commented Sep 11, 2020

Hi,
I used LTR retriever to calculate LAI of wheat,which is an allohexaploid(AABBDD).I took all wheat genome into LTR retriever,and I want to get LAI for each subgenome.I use this command:

for i in `subgenomeA subgenomeB subgenomeD `
do
LAI -genome wheatCS.fa -intact genome.fa.pass.list -all genome.fa.out -mono $i.list
done

The genome file ,intact file and all(.out) file are generated by whole wheat genome.The subgenomeA/B/D.list is the name list of subgenome chromosome.Can I get the correct result of LAI?Need I extract each subgenome from genome file ,intact file and all(.out) file?

Sincerely

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

Yes, this is the right way to calculate LAI for polyploid. Consider using -totLTR and -iden if you want to compare multiple genomes because these two values affect LAI pretty easily. You may use values from the "best" (in a subjective manner) genome as the standard and set it on other genomes.

@cassondranewman
Copy link

Hello,
Thank you for creating this assembly metric! I wanted to ask- if you are comparing two polyploids of the same species (an intraspecific comparison) can you simply compare the whole-genome raw LAI score?

In other words, if you are doing an intraspecific comparison of polyploids, does the corrected LAI score need to be computed per subgenome [as shown above] - or is comparing whole-genome raw LAI scores enough?

@oushujun
Copy link
Owner

oushujun commented Aug 3, 2021 via email

@cassondranewman
Copy link

Thank you for the clarification! I appreciate it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants