Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use python@3.12 for formulae with python bindings #2580

Open
5 of 9 tasks
scpeters opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
5 of 9 tasks

Use python@3.12 for formulae with python bindings #2580

scpeters opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@scpeters
Copy link
Member

scpeters commented Feb 23, 2024

Now that python@3.12 is the default python3 formula (see Homebrew/homebrew-core#150390), we should update our formulae to use python@3.12 for the formulae with python bindings.

@mengchaoheng
Copy link

Is it some relationship between this and PX4/PX4-Autopilot#22826 ?

@scpeters
Copy link
Member Author

Is it some relationship between this and PX4/PX4-Autopilot#22826 ?

gazebo-classic doesn't use python bindings, so I don't think this is related to your PX4 issue

@mengchaoheng
Copy link

gazebo-classic doesn't use python bindings,

I mean, as a px4 user, when I use gazebo11 for simulation, it can work normally even if my python3 environment is not python3.12, right? @scpeters

Sorry, I am currently troubled by px4 gazebo simulation problems. All compilation tasks are completed but gazebo fails.

@scpeters
Copy link
Member Author

gazebo-classic doesn't use python bindings,

I mean, as a px4 user, when I use gazebo11 for simulation, it can work normally even if my python3 environment is not python3.12, right? @scpeters

Sorry, I am currently troubled by px4 gazebo simulation problems. All compilation tasks are completed but gazebo fails.

gazebo11 does not directly use python. Unfortunately I can't answer questions about px4, so I recommend asking in a more relevant forum.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants