Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement some conditional tags/values to the obf data #19838

Open
Chefche opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Implement some conditional tags/values to the obf data #19838

Chefche opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning

Comments

@Chefche
Copy link

Chefche commented May 11, 2024

Describe the idea (required)

Hello:
After kindly implementing objects complying to boundary=protected_area && protect_class=14 to obf data, I would like to ask for the implementation of some further values to existing tags:

  1. access: discouraged

And some not yet implemented tags:

  1. seasonal=spring/summer/autumn/winter (casting anything else than "seasonal=no" to "seasonal=yes" would already be an appreciated progress)
  2. access:conditional=no @ ...
  3. access:offroad= no
  4. access:offroad:conditional= no @ ...
  5. access:onroad= no
  6. access:onroad:conditional= no @ ...

Thank you very much and best regards

Tell us about the expected behaviour (required)

The above mentioned objects complying to boundary=protected_area && protect_class=14 are often supplemented by conditional access rules as indicated by the requested tags. When the requested tags are implemented to the obf data, the respective polygons could be rendered differently and thus making the conditions easily visible to the reader.

Tell us about alternatives you've considered (required)

Alternatives are currently only maps available on the internet that already implemented the suggested rendering. Which is of course not possible on a hiking tour without network coverage.

Context (optional)

No response

@vshcherb vshcherb added the Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning label May 13, 2024
@vshcherb
Copy link
Member

Conditional tags are supported in routing but not in POI data yet

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Nice to Have Should be fixed but there is no priority or no possibility to fix it within current horizon planning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants