Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Pax Exam [PAXCONSTRUCT-104] #120

Open
ops4j-issues opened this issue Mar 19, 2009 · 1 comment
Open

Support Pax Exam [PAXCONSTRUCT-104] #120

ops4j-issues opened this issue Mar 19, 2009 · 1 comment
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ops4j-issues
Copy link

Alin Dreghiciu created PAXCONSTRUCT-104

I think that Pax Construct should facilitate creation of Pax Exam modules, this either additional options in pax-create-module but maybe better via a specialized new goal/script
This should generate a new module including dependencies to minimum set of pax exam artifacts such as can be seen here: http://wiki.ops4j.org//x/bICr

As in the near future we will have also support for TestNG I suggest that this shoudl be configurable:

  • what unit test framework to be used: junit, testng with default junit
  • what mocking framework to be used: easymock, jmock, mockito with no default

The generated module should also include a test class with the @RunWith annotation, a configuration method, one test method (for Junit), something similar for TestNg.
Also if the mocking framework is specified the configuration could already include the JUnitOptions.easyMockBundles() option.

Maybe we could even support pax exam/test framework/mocking framework versions and then generate the necessary options...


Fixed in: 1.7.0
Votes: 1, Watches: 1

@ops4j-issues
Copy link
Author

Stuart McCulloch commented

Target this for 1.5

@ops4j-issues ops4j-issues added the type: new feature New Feature label Feb 24, 2021
@ops4j-issues ops4j-issues added this to the 1.7.0 milestone Feb 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant