Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect statements about release man pages #423

Open
paulidale opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Incorrect statements about release man pages #423

paulidale opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor

The Documentation page states:

The manual pages for all supported releases are available.

Clicking through reads thus:

The manual pages for all releases are available online:

[master](https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster)
[3.1](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.1)
[3.0](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0)
[1.1.1](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1)
[1.0.2](https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2)

The first statement is incorrect because we include more than just supported releases.
The second is incorrect because not all releases are included.

I'm not advocating the removal of any of the man pages, just tightening the wording in both cases. To what eludes me currently.

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Sep 22, 2023

So, I guess it should be something like "for current development as well as all supported releases". That would fit what we put on display, no?

(3.2 in alpha state is still "current development")

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are no longer supported releases (at least for the vast majority of people who'll stumble over this).

@levitte
Copy link
Member

levitte commented Sep 22, 2023

I'd like to argue that they are supported, just not for free. But hey, if you want to be wordy, how about "for current development as well as all supported (publicly or through premium support) releases".

@mattcaswell
Copy link
Member

"The manual pages for all supported and some older releases are available."

@paulidale
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mattcaswell, that's the wording I couldn't figure out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants