We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently there is no linter for doc and docstrings.
As a follow up, this should really be linted. I would advocate using ruff but theoretically that's blocked on still supporting python 3.6 (#1083).
ruff
Should work if working in an environment that's 3.7+ though.
The alternative is to use pydocstyle.
pydocstyle
This would prevent issues like #716 from appearing. (which I guess can be closed now?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ruff is the way to go here I think. Since we want to drop 3.6 and fewer tools for the same functional behavior is better.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently there is no linter for doc and docstrings.
As a follow up, this should really be linted. I would advocate using
ruffbut theoretically that's blocked on still supporting python 3.6 (#1083).Should work if working in an environment that's 3.7+ though.
The alternative is to use
pydocstyle.This would prevent issues like #716 from appearing. (which I guess can be closed now?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: