Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with POCO installation #757

Open
abs3n opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Issue with POCO installation #757

abs3n opened this issue Nov 7, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@abs3n
Copy link

abs3n commented Nov 7, 2023

Hi, can someone tell me why I am getting the below errors, despite adding DEPENDS = "poco" in my package recipe?

ERROR: scanner-v1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/demo contained in package scanner requires libPocoNet.so.95()(64bit), but no providers found in RDEPENDS:scanner? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: scanner-v1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/demo contained in package scanner requires libPocoFoundation.so.95()(64bit), but no providers found in RDEPENDS:scanner? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: scanner-v1.0-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/bin/demo contained in package scanner requires libPocoZip.so.95()(64bit), but no providers found in RDEPENDS:scanner? [file-rdeps]

This is from my recipe-

DEPENDS = "poco" 

do_install() {
    install -d ${D}/usr/bin
    install -m 0755 ${THISDIR}/files/demo ${D}/usr/bin/
}
@abs3n
Copy link
Author

abs3n commented Nov 8, 2023

Ok, found the root cause. Seems like meta-oe is still fetching Poco 1.12.4 while I compiled with 1.12.5. How often do you maintain/upgrade POCO recipes?

@kraj
Copy link
Contributor

kraj commented Nov 8, 2023

It depends on when someone sends a patch to bump the version

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants