Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rediscuss file presentations incl. formalization of access modalities #501

Open
olinux opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
question further information is requested request any request or update for schemas

Comments

@olinux
Copy link
Member

olinux commented Mar 19, 2024

I would like to rediscuss the way files are represented in openMINDS currently. The following aspects seem to be non-ideal:

  • distinction of the location/access url and "file" since the same file could potentially have multiple locations
  • properties in file representations which are usually not easily automatically acquired (such as "specialUsageRole", "contentDescription" etc.) should be extracted from the "file" entity to simplify automatic ingestion
  • for access protected resources (this is also relevant e.g. for protected web services), we should find a way to formalize the authentication protocols required for such a file so automated pipelines have a chance to execute the proper steps for gathering a valid token and to properly authenticate.
@olinux
Copy link
Member Author

olinux commented Mar 19, 2024

Also in this aspect, we might want to think about how to deal with archives (ZIP / TARs) and/or the "FileArchive" schema

@lzehl
Copy link
Member

lzehl commented Mar 19, 2024

related past issue (closed) #257

@apdavison
Copy link
Member

I think #318 is also relevant. We probably need a brainstorming meeting to work through all of this.

@UlrikeS91 UlrikeS91 added request any request or update for schemas question further information is requested labels May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question further information is requested request any request or update for schemas
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants