Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It's not possible to set Jack Transport back to start. #302

Closed
grammoboy2 opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

It's not possible to set Jack Transport back to start. #302

grammoboy2 opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@grammoboy2
Copy link

It's not possible to set Jack Transport back to start. Luppp runs from The Netherlands to Ireland if you don't stop it. No way to get is back to start (monopoly trauma? ;) )

This way I can't play with non-timeline doing automation in non-mixer, which is processing audio from Luppp.

@moonshaadow
Copy link

Same here.
Related to #280 I think.
The way luppp manages transport seems buggy. It makes luppp unusable with other apps, and it's a shame. Sync and transport should be a main feature for a looper. By the way I think ableton link is another step. Transport has to be fixed first.
Is the same problem in NSM ? I'm gonna take a look.

@moonshaadow
Copy link

Same in NSM.

@harryhaaren
Copy link
Member

JACK Transport bugs are a known issue - already being tracked here: #280.

Note that NSM being in use or not will have no effect at all on how JACK Transport/Timebase is handled.

Note also that the JACK Transport isn't natively a good match for live looping, due to "Slow Start" clients and such. Technically Ableton's Link is a closer match for what Luppp would like to achieve - being in sync (beat and phrase) with other applications.. which is already filed as a different feature-request here: #303

I'll close this to avoid too many tracks on the same topic - thanks for raising concerns though. Further discussion on each topic in the relevant issue please :) Cheers, -Harry

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants