Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the Texas County Data CSV #58

Open
newswim opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Update the Texas County Data CSV #58

newswim opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@newswim
Copy link
Contributor

newswim commented Mar 13, 2024

This file was last updated 2 years ago.

Scope

Go through the counties and validate that

  1. The portal URLs are still correct
  2. The version of Odyssey is still correct
  3. Other metadata also correct

Link: https://github.com/open-austin/azure-indigent-defense/blob/main/resources/texas_county_data.csv

@newswim newswim added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 13, 2024
@tpadmanabhan
Copy link
Collaborator

Review with Nick and Nidhi on 3/31

@tpadmanabhan
Copy link
Collaborator

Assigned to Nick. Target due date 4/13/24

@tpadmanabhan
Copy link
Collaborator

What is scope of counties here? @lianilychee

@tpadmanabhan
Copy link
Collaborator

@nicolassaw Nick, please prioritize counties based on what Fair Defense wants (Nate)

@nicolassaw
Copy link

I'm having a tough time finding the API end points for some of these Odyssey search engines. Anybody have any resources on seeing if there is an open API for a given online search function? I tried the Google chrome inspect>network>xhr process but that requires the page to load and make the get requests, but sometimes the links that make the requests open in a new window. Any ideas?

@nicolassaw
Copy link

I submitted a new version of the dataset that has the following changes:
(1) Corrected URLs for some search pages.
(2) Added two new fields per county, described below:
--attys_high_caseloads_count_fy22: This represents the number of attorneys that disposed a number of appointed cases that would exceed an approximation of a national caseload standard for cases to work on within a year. --avg_atty_caseload_fy22: This represents the average number of appointed cases that an attorney in the jurisdiction reported closing within the fiscal year.

Possible Next Steps:
(1) Review the remainder of the links to correct broken or inaccurate links to search pages. Focus on County and District court links only.
(2) Consider if there are other data weighing factors to consider and add those fields to sheet.

Note:
(1) As I review URLs, I noticed that some of the links provided for the county included search engines for Justice of the Peace Courts. They only preside over class C misdemeanors and you don't have a right to counsel in those cases. Instead, the search engine link provided should be a link to the adult misdemeanor and felony courts (also known as County and District Courts, respectively) because these are the courts in which you have a right to counsel.

@nicolassaw
Copy link

Should I upload the source data for the fields I added to the table?

It came from a public report on this page (https://tidc.tamu.edu/public.net/Reports/AttorneyCaseLoad.aspx) and I did some analysis on it.

@newswim
Copy link
Contributor Author

newswim commented May 5, 2024

Thanks for working on this, Nick! I saw your PR and added the two versions to this spreadsheet for spot checking. We're not actually using the .csv for anything right now, it's more of a reference for devs to use as we start adding more counties to the corpus.

I think it's totally fine to add any metadata that you think would be helpful.

Here's that spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YBuU4hKufhzA-K-ZXbJ42u04t5X82PBoAazSK8RcVoM/edit#gid=0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
Status: 🔖 To-do
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants