Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider evaluation of licensing terms and best practices for their declaration #194

Open
mellybelly opened this issue Jun 28, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@mellybelly
Copy link

Related to #20 and #77, among others.
See our eval of and rubric for public databases: http://reusabledata.org/
(please make a ticket or PR for any new resources you may want evaluated)

Even when "open" often the terms are not clear.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213090

Would like very much to collaborate on these aspects.

@mlinksva
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, thanks for pointing out RDP; I read the paper and will probably file some issues in its repo.

I'm not sure what "Consider evaluation of licensing terms and best practices for their declaration" means in the context of the Open Definition. What do you envision would merit closing this issue?

There is significant overlap between https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/ and http://reusabledata.org/criteria.html ... I wonder if anyone has done a mapping between the two?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants