forked from garretchristensen/BestPracticesManual
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Bibliography.bib.bak
3922 lines (3310 loc) · 300 KB
/
Bibliography.bib.bak
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
% This file was created with JabRef 2.10.
% Encoding: Cp1252
@Article{&na;_registration_2010,
Title = {The Registration of Observational Studies When Metaphors Go Bad:},
Author = {{\&Na;}},
Journal = {Epidemiology},
Year = {2010},
Month = jul,
Pages = {1},
Doi = {10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181eafbcf},
ISSN = {1044-3983},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {The Registration of Observational Studies—When Metaphors Go Bad},
Url = {http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001648-900000000-99655},
Urldate = {2014-10-28}
}
@Article{acemoglu_colonial_2012,
Title = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply},
Author = {Acemoglu, Daron and Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2012},
Month = oct,
Number = {6},
Pages = {3077--3110},
Volume = {102},
Abstract = {Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001) established that economic institutions today are correlated with expected mortality of European colonialists. David Albouy argues this relationship is not robust. He drops all data from Latin America and much of the data from Africa, making up almost 60 percent of our sample, despite much information on the mortality of Europeans in those places during the colonial period. He also includes a "campaign" dummy that is coded inconsistently; even modest corrections undermine his claims. We also show that limiting the effect of outliers strengthens our results, making them robust to even extreme versions of Albouy's critiques.},
Doi = {10.1257/aer.102.6.3077},
Shorttitle = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development}
}
@Article{acemoglu_colonial_2001,
Title = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation},
Author = {Acemoglu, Daron and Johnson, Simon and Robinson, James A},
Journal = {American Economic Review},
Year = {2001},
Month = dec,
Number = {5},
Pages = {1369--1401},
Volume = {91},
Doi = {10.1257/aer.91.5.1369},
File = {AER (91,5) p. 1369 - The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development\: An Empirical Investigation:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\K96I5TIP\\articles.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development},
Url = {https://www-aeaweb-org.proxy.swarthmore.edu/articles.php?f=s&doi=10.1257/aer.91.5.1369},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{alatas_targeting_2012,
Title = {Targeting the Poor: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia},
Author = {Alatas, Vivi and Banerjee, Abhijit and Hanna, Rema and Olken, Benjamin A and Tobias, Julia},
Journal = {American Economic Review},
Year = {2012},
Month = jun,
Number = {4},
Pages = {1206--1240},
Volume = {102},
Doi = {10.1257/aer.102.4.1206},
File = {AER (102,4) p. 1206 - Targeting the Poor\: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\9DWN64BK\\articles.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {Targeting the Poor},
Url = {https://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/aer.102.4.1206&fnd=s},
Urldate = {2014-10-01}
}
@Article{albouy_colonial_2012,
Title = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment},
Author = {Albouy, David Y.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2012},
Month = oct,
Number = {6},
Pages = {3059--3076},
Volume = {102},
Abstract = {Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson's (2001) seminal article argues property-rights institutions powerfully affect national income, using estimated mortality rates of early European settlers to instrument capital expropriation risk. However, 36 of the 64 countries in the sample are assigned mortality rates from other countries, often based on mistaken or conflicting evidence. Also, incomparable mortality rates from populations of laborers, bishops, and soldiers—often on campaign—are combined in a manner that favors the hypothesis. When these data issues are controlled for, the relationship between mortality and expropriation risk lacks robustness, and instrumental-variable estimates become unreliable, often with infinite confidence intervals.},
Doi = {10.1257/aer.102.6.3059},
Shorttitle = {The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development}
}
@Article{almeida_impact_2012,
Title = {The Impact of Vocational Training for the Unemployed in Turkey: Pre-Analysis Plan},
Author = {Almeida, Rita and Hirshleifer, Sarojini and McKenzie, David and Ridao-Cano, Cristobal and Yener, Ahmed Levent},
Journal = {Poverty Action Lab Hypothesis Registry},
Year = {2012},
Month = feb,
Url = {http://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/documents/ISKURIE_AnalysisPlan_v4.pdf}
}
@Article{almond_is_2006,
Title = {Is the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Over? Long Term Effects of In Utero Influenza Exposure in the Post1940 U.S. Population},
Author = {Almond, Douglas},
Journal = {Journal of Political Economy},
Year = {2006},
Month = aug,
Number = {4},
Pages = {672--712},
Volume = {114},
Abstract = {This paper uses the 1918 influenza pandemic as a natural experiment for testing the fetal origins hypothesis. The pandemic arrived unexpectedly in the fall of 1918 and had largely subsided by January 1919, generating sharp predictions for long�term effects. Data from the 1960–80 decennial U.S. Census indicate that cohorts in utero during the pandemic displayed reduced educational attainment, increased rates of physical disability, lower income, lower socioeconomic status, and higher transfer payments compared with other birth cohorts. These results indicate that investments in fetal health can increase human capital.},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2006 The University of Chicago Press},
Doi = {10.1086/jpe.2006.114.issue-4},
ISSN = {0022-3808},
Shorttitle = {Is the 1918 Influenza Pandemic Over?},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/507154},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{anderson_fwer,
Title = {Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects},
Author = {Anderson, Michael L.},
Journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},
Year = {2008},
Number = {484},
Pages = {1481-1495},
Volume = {103},
Doi = {10.1198/016214508000000841},
Eprint = {
http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
},
Url = {
http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
}
}
@Article{anderson_registration_2013,
Title = {Registration and Replication: A Comment},
Author = {Anderson, Richard G.},
Journal = {Political Analysis},
Year = {2013},
Month = jan,
Number = {1},
Pages = {38--39},
Volume = {21},
Doi = {10.1093/pan/mps034},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\2BVUD8MF\\Anderson - 2013 - Registration and Replication A Comment.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\VCMHDK68\\38.html:text/html},
ISSN = {1047-1987, 1476-4989},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {Registration and Replication},
Url = {http://pan.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/1/38},
Urldate = {2014-08-28}
}
@Article{anderson_replication_1994,
Title = {Replication and scientific standards in applied economics a decade after the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking project},
Author = {Anderson, Richard G. and Dewald, William G.},
Journal = {Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review},
Year = {1994},
Number = {Nov},
Pages = {79--83},
File = {RePEc Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\NKMSHAB8\\y_3a1994_3ai_3anov_3ap_3a79-83.html:text/html},
Keywords = {Research},
Url = {http://econpapers.repec.org/article/fipfedlrv/y_3a1994_3ai_3anov_3ap_3a79-83.htm},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{anderson_role_2008,
Title = {The role of data/code archives in the future of economic research},
Author = {Anderson, Richard G. and Greene, William H. and McCullough, B. D. and Vinod, H. D.},
Journal = {Journal of Economic Methodology},
Year = {2008},
Number = {1},
Pages = {99--119},
Volume = {15},
Abstract = {This essay examines the role of data and program�code archives in making economic research ‘replicable.’ Replication of published results is recognized as an essential part of the scientific method. Yet, historically, both the ‘demand for’ and ‘supply of’ replicable results in economics has been minimal. ‘Respect for the scientific method’ is not sufficient to motivate either economists or editors of professional journals to ensure the replicability of published results. We enumerate the costs and benefits of mandatory data and code archives, and argue that the benefits far exceed the costs. Progress has been made since the gloomy assessment of Dewald, Thursby and Anderson some 20 years ago in the American Economic Review, but much remains to be done before empirical economics ceases to be a ‘dismal science’ when judged by the replicability of its published results.},
Doi = {10.1080/13501780801915574},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\NNWSITCD\\Anderson et al. - 2008 - The role of datacode archives in the future of ec.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\NT9DFTIR\\13501780801915574.html:text/html},
ISSN = {1350-178X},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501780801915574},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{andreoli-versbach_open_????,
Title = {Open access to data: An ideal professed but not practised},
Author = {Andreoli-Versbach, Patrick and Mueller-Langer, Frank},
Journal = {Research Policy},
Abstract = {Data-sharing is an essential tool for replication, validation and extension of empirical results. Using a hand-collected data set describing the data-sharing behaviour of 488 randomly selected empirical researchers, we provide evidence that most researchers in economics and management do not share their data voluntarily. We derive testable hypotheses based on the theoretical literature on information-sharing and relate data-sharing to observable characteristics of researchers. We find empirical support for the hypotheses that voluntary data-sharing significantly increases with (a) academic tenure, (b) the quality of researchers, (c) the share of published articles subject to a mandatory data-disclosure policy of journals, and (d) personal attitudes towards “open science� principles. On the basis of our empirical evidence, we discuss a set of policy recommendations.},
Doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.008},
File = {ScienceDirect Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\ETGVNNZQ\\S0048733314000699.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0048-7333},
Keywords = {Mandatory data-disclosure, Open science, Voluntary data-sharing},
Shorttitle = {Open access to data},
Url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733314000699},
Urldate = {2014-08-29}
}
@Article{angrist_credibility_2010,
Title = {The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics},
Author = {Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen},
Journal = {Journal of Economic Perspectives},
Year = {2010},
Month = may,
Number = {2},
Pages = {3--30},
Volume = {24},
Doi = {10.1257/jep.24.2.3},
File = {JEP (24,2) p. 3 - The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics\: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\NNXZ8AAF\\articles.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0895-3309},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics},
Url = {https://www-aeaweb-org.proxy.swarthmore.edu/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jep.24.2.3},
Urldate = {2014-09-08}
}
@Book{angrist2008mostly,
Title = {Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion},
Author = {Angrist, Joshua D and Pischke, J{\"o}rn-Steffen},
Publisher = {Princeton university press},
Year = {2008}
}
@Article{antonovics_does_2005,
Title = {Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation? Comment},
Author = {Antonovics, Kate L. and Goldberger, Arthur S.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2005},
Month = dec,
Number = {5},
Pages = {1738--1744},
Volume = {95},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2005 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\95TJCXRX\\Antonovics and Goldberger - 2005 - Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the School.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Shorttitle = {Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation?},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132776},
Urldate = {2014-09-23}
}
@Article{ashenfelter1999review,
Title = {A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias},
Author = {Ashenfelter, Orley and Harmon, Colm and Oosterbeek, Hessel},
Journal = {Labour economics},
Year = {1999},
Number = {4},
Pages = {453--470},
Volume = {6},
Publisher = {Elsevier}
}
@Article{ashton_national_2010,
Title = {Do national soccer results really impact on the stock market?},
Author = {Ashton, J. K. and Gerrard, B. and Hudson, R.},
Journal = {Applied Economics},
Year = {2010},
Month = nov,
Number = {26},
Pages = {3709--3717},
Volume = {43},
Abstract = {This study is a response to Klein et al. (2008), which was highly critical of earlier work by Ashton et al. (2003). This work considering the link between international soccer results and stock market returns was challenged by Klein et al. (2008), who reject the presence and importance of this link. In response, this work provides a reassessment of the link between international soccer results and stock market returns within Ashton et al. (2003). This new analysis extends the original work by using a larger dataset, employing an extended range of tests and allowing for outliers. It is reported that, contrary to the findings of Klein et al. (2008), the link between international soccer results and stock market prices does indeed exist particularly within the sample period 1984–2002 used by Ashton et al. (2003). After extending the dataset to include observations from 2002 until 2009, it is reported that the effect on stock market returns has declined in importance over this period, particularly the impact of wins.},
Doi = {10.1080/00036841003689762},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\45JFF45V\\Ashton et al. - 2010 - Do national soccer results really impact on the st.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\CD2H9AH5\\00036841003689762.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0003-6846},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036841003689762},
Urldate = {2014-08-28}
}
@Article{ashton_economic_2003,
Title = {Economic impact of national sporting success: evidence from the London stock exchange},
Author = {Ashton, J. K. and Gerrard, B. and Hudson, R.},
Journal = {Applied Economics Letters},
Year = {2003},
Month = oct,
Number = {12},
Pages = {783--785},
Volume = {10},
Abstract = {In this article strong association is reported between the performance of the England football team and subsequent daily changes in the {FTSE} 100 index, representing the price of shares in the 100 largest companies traded on the London stock exchange.},
Doi = {10.1080/1350485032000126712},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\N86J838Z\\Ashton et al. - 2003 - Economic impact of national sporting success evid.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\VEH27K34\\1350485032000126712.html:text/html},
ISSN = {1350-4851},
Shorttitle = {Economic impact of national sporting success},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350485032000126712},
Urldate = {2014-08-28}
}
@Article{auspurg_what_2011,
Title = {What Fuels Publication Bias? Theoretical and Empirical Analyses of Risk Factors Using the Caliper Test},
Author = {Auspurg, Katrin and Hinz, Thomas},
Journal = {Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik)},
Year = {2011},
Number = {5-6},
Pages = {636--660},
Volume = {231},
Abstract = {Significance tests were originally developed to enable more objective evaluations of research results. Yet the strong orientation towards statistical significance encourages biased results, a phenomenon termed “publication bias�. Publication bias occurs whenever the likelihood or time-lag of publication, or the prominence, language, impact factor of journal space or the citation rate of studies depend on the direction and significance of research findings. Although there is much evidence concerning the existence of publication bias in all scientific disciplines and although its detrimental consequences for the progress of the sciences have been known for a long time, all attempts to eliminate the bias have failed. The present article reviews the history and logic of significance testing, the state of research on publication bias, and existing practical recommendations. After demonstrating that more systematical research on the risk factors of publication bias is needed, the paper suggests two new directions for publication bias research. First, a more comprehensive theoretical model based on theories of rational choice and economics as well as on the sociology of science is sketched out. Publication bias is recognized as the outcome of a social dilemma that cannot be overcome by moral pleas alone. Second, detection methods for publication bias going beyond meta-analysis, ones that are more suitable for testing causal hypotheses, are discussed. In particular, the “caliper test� seems well-suited for conducting theoretically motivated comparisons across heterogeneous research fields like sociology. Its potential is demonstrated by testing hypotheses on (a) the relevance of explicitly vs. implicitly stated research propositions and on (b) the relevance of the number of authors on incidence rates of publication bias in 50 papers published in leading German sociology journals.},
File = {RePEc Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\XU8VSDT7\\v231y2011i5-6p636-660.html:text/html},
Keywords = {caliper test, Publication bias, rational choice, Significance testing, sociology of science.},
Shorttitle = {What Fuels Publication Bias?},
Url = {http://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v231y2011i5-6p636-660.html},
Urldate = {2014-08-19}
}
@Article{ayres_latest_2003,
Title = {The Latest Misfires in Support of the "More Guns, Less Crime" Hypothesis},
Author = {Ayres, Ian and Donohue III, John J.},
Journal = {Stanford Law Review},
Year = {2003},
Month = apr,
Number = {4},
Pages = {1371--1398},
Volume = {55},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2003 Stanford Law Review},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\NJN8ETR2\\Ayres and III - 2003 - The Latest Misfires in Support of the More Guns, .pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0038-9765},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229605},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{ayres_shooting_2003,
Title = {Shooting down the "More Guns, Less Crime" Hypothesis},
Author = {Ayres, Ian and Donohue III, John J.},
Journal = {Stanford Law Review},
Year = {2003},
Month = apr,
Number = {4},
Pages = {1193--1312},
Volume = {55},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2003 Stanford Law Review},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\PXQNJN4Q\\Ayres and III - 2003 - Shooting down the More Guns, Less Crime Hypothes.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0038-9765},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229603},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{baicker_katherine_oregon_2014,
Title = {The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment: Evidence from Criminal Charges Data, Analysis Plan},
Author = {Baicker, Katherine and Finkelstein, Amy and Taubman, Sarah},
Year = {2014},
Month = apr,
Series = {{NBER} Working Paper},
Url = {http://www.nber.org/oregon/files/oregon_hie_crime_analysis_plan.pdf}
}
@Article{doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1212321,
Title = {The Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes},
Author = {Baicker, Katherine and Taubman, Sarah L. and Allen, Heidi L. and Bernstein, Mira and Gruber, Jonathan H. and Newhouse, Joseph P. and Schneider, Eric C. and Wright, Bill J. and Zaslavsky, Alan M. and Finkelstein, Amy N.},
Journal = {New England Journal of Medicine},
Year = {2013},
Note = {PMID: 23635051},
Number = {18},
Pages = {1713-1722},
Volume = {368},
Doi = {10.1056/NEJMsa1212321},
Eprint = {http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMsa1212321},
Url = {http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1212321}
}
@Article{barrick1991big5,
Title = {The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis},
Author = {Barrick, Murray R and Mount, Michael K},
Journal = {Personnel psychology},
Year = {1991},
Number = {1},
Pages = {1--26},
Volume = {44},
Publisher = {Wiley Online Library}
}
@Article{begg_c_improving_1996,
Title = {Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The consort statement},
Author = {{Begg C} and {Cho M} and {Eastwood S} and {et al}},
Journal = {{JAMA}},
Year = {1996},
Month = aug,
Number = {8},
Pages = {637--639},
Volume = {276},
Abstract = {{THE} {RANDOMIZED} controlled trial ({RCT}), more than any other methodology, can have a powerful and immediate impact on patient care. Ideally, the report of such an evaluation needs to convey to the reader relevant information concerning the design, conduct, analysis, and generalizability of the trial. This information should provide the reader with the ability to make informed judgments regarding the internal and external validity of the trial. Accurate and complete reporting also benefits editors and reviewers in their deliberations regarding submitted manuscripts. For {RCTs} to ultimately benefit patients, the published report should be of the highest possible standard.For editorial comment see p 649.Â
Evidence produced repeatedly over the last 30 years indicates a wide chasm between what a trial should report and what is actually published in the literature. In a review of 71 {RCTs} with negative results published between 1960 and 1975, the authors reported that the vast},
Doi = {10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\HCK2H7WC\\Begg C et al. - 1996 - Improving the quality of reporting of randomized c.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0098-7484},
Shorttitle = {Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030},
Urldate = {2014-08-29}
}
@Article{behrman_does_2005,
Title = {Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation? Reply},
Author = {Behrman, Jere R. and Rosenzweig, Mark R.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2005},
Month = dec,
Number = {5},
Pages = {1745--1751},
Volume = {95},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2005 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\7ZJXU3S3\\Behrman and Rosenzweig - 2005 - Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the School.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Shorttitle = {Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation?},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132777},
Urldate = {2014-09-23}
}
@Article{behrman_does_2002,
Title = {Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the Schooling of the Next Generation?},
Author = {Behrman, Jere R. and Rosenzweig, Mark R.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2002},
Month = mar,
Number = {1},
Pages = {323--334},
Volume = {92},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2002 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\Z9FUB53C\\Behrman and Rosenzweig - 2002 - Does Increasing Women's Schooling Raise the School.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083336},
Urldate = {2014-09-23}
}
@Article{benjamini1995controlling,
Title = {Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing},
Author = {Benjamini, Yoav and Hochberg, Yosef},
Journal = {Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological)},
Year = {1995},
Pages = {289--300},
Publisher = {JSTOR}
}
@Article{benjamini2006adaptive,
Title = {Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate},
Author = {Benjamini, Yoav and Krieger, Abba M and Yekutieli, Daniel},
Journal = {Biometrika},
Year = {2006},
Number = {3},
Pages = {491--507},
Volume = {93},
Publisher = {Biometrika Trust}
}
@Article{bhattacharjee_diederik_2013,
Title = {Diederik Stapel Audacious Academic Fraud},
Author = {Bhattacharjee, Yudhijit},
Journal = {The New York Times},
Year = {2013},
Month = apr,
Abstract = {Diederik Stapel, a Dutch social psychologist, perpetrated an audacious academic fraud by making up studies that told the world what it wanted to hear about human nature.},
Chapter = {Magazine},
File = {New York Times Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\KVN625TA\\diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0362-4331},
Keywords = {Frauds and Swindling, Netherlands, Psychology and Psychologists, Research, Stapel, Diederik, Tilburg University},
Url = {http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html},
Urldate = {2014-09-12}
}
@Article{bloom1995minimum,
Title = {Minimum detectable effects a simple way to report the statistical power of experimental designs},
Author = {Bloom, Howard S},
Journal = {Evaluation review},
Year = {1995},
Number = {5},
Pages = {547--556},
Volume = {19},
Publisher = {Sage Publications}
}
@Book{broad_betrayers_1983,
Title = {Betrayers of the truth},
Author = {Broad, William and Broad, William J. and Wade, Nicholas},
Publisher = {Simon and Schuster},
Year = {1983},
Month = jan,
Abstract = {"Fraud and deceit in the halls of science"--Cover subtitle.},
ISBN = {9780671447694},
Keywords = {Biography \& Autobiography / Science \& Technology, Deception, Fraud in science, Reference / Research, science, Science / Research \& Methodology},
Language = {en}
}
@TechReport{brodeur_star_2012,
Title = {Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back},
Author = {Brodeur, Abel and Le, Mathias and Sangnier, Marc and Zylberberg, Yanos},
Institution = {Social Science Research Network},
Year = {2012},
Address = {Rochester, {NY}},
Month = jun,
Number = {{ID} 2089580},
Type = {{SSRN} Scholarly Paper},
Abstract = {Journals favor rejections of the null hypothesis. This selection upon results may distort the behavior of researchers. Using 50,000 tests published between 2005 and 2011 in the {AER}, {JPE} and {QJE}, we identify a residual in the distribution of tests that cannot be explained by selection. The distribution of p-values exhibits a camel shape with abundant p-values above .25, a valley between .25 and .10 and a bump slightly under .05. Missing tests are those which would have been accepted but close to being rejected (p-values between .25 and .10). We show that this pattern corresponds to a shift in the distribution of p-values: between 10\% and 20\% of marginally rejected tests are misallocated. Our interpretation is that researchers might be tempted to inflate the value of their tests by choosing the specification that provides the highest statistics. Note that Inflation is larger in articles where stars are used in order to highlight statistical significance and lower in articles with theoretical models.},
File = {Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\64W563JE\\papers.html:text/html},
Keywords = {distorting incentives, Hypothesis testing, research in economics, selection bias},
Shorttitle = {Star Wars},
Url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2089580},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{bronars_criminal_1998,
Title = {Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns},
Author = {Bronars, Stephen G. and Lott, Jr., John R.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {1998},
Month = may,
Number = {2},
Pages = {475--479},
Volume = {88},
Copyright = {Copyright © 1998 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\AR4F3WXQ\\Bronars and Lott - 1998 - Criminal Deterrence, Geographic Spillovers, and th.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/116970},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{brown_1918_2010,
Title = {The 1918 U.S. Influenza Pandemic as a Natural Experiment, Revisited},
Author = {Brown, Ryan},
Year = {2010},
Month = oct,
Abstract = {Douglas Almond's use of the 1918 U.S. in uenza pandemic as a
natural experiment led to the seminal works on the subject of in utero
health's impact on later life outcomes. The identi⬚cation strength and
clarity of his work, though, is driven by the inherent natural experi-
ment supposition of random assignment. By using data from the 1920
and 1930 U.S. census, this study investigates this keystone assump-
tion and shows that the families of the {\textbackslash}treatment" cohort used by
Douglas Almond were signi⬚cantly less literate and economically pros-
perous than the families of the {\textbackslash}control" group. The ⬚rst order e⬚ect
of parent's education and wealth on a child's long-run {SES} and health
conditions eliminates Almond's ability to make direct inference on fe
tal health's impact on one's long-term wellbeing using the 1918 U.S.
in uenza pandemic.},
Url = {http://mitsloan.mit.edu/neudc/papers/paper_276.pdf}
}
@Article{bruhn_pursuit_2009,
Title = {In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments},
Author = {Bruhn, Miriam and McKenzie, David},
Journal = {American Economic Journal: Applied Economics},
Year = {2009},
Month = oct,
Number = {4},
Pages = {200--232},
Volume = {1},
Abstract = {We present new evidence on the randomization methods used in existing experiments, and new simulations comparing these methods. We find that many papers do not describe the randomization in detail, implying that better reporting is needed. Our simulations suggest that in samples of 300 or more, the different methods perform similarly. However, for very persistent outcome variables, and in smaller samples, pair-wise matching and stratification perform best and appear to dominate the rerandomization methods commonly used in practice. The simulations also point to specific recommendations for which variables to balance on, and for which controls to include in the ex post analysis.},
Doi = {10.1257/app.1.4.200},
Shorttitle = {In Pursuit of Balance}
}
@Article{burnside_aid_2004,
Title = {Aid, Policies, and Growth: Reply},
Author = {Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2004},
Month = jun,
Number = {3},
Pages = {781--784},
Volume = {94},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2004 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\JGFHQF96\\Burnside and Dollar - 2004 - Aid, Policies, and Growth Reply.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Shorttitle = {Aid, Policies, and Growth},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592955},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{burnside_aid_2000,
Title = {Aid, Policies, and Growth},
Author = {Burnside, Craig and Dollar, David},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2000},
Month = sep,
Number = {4},
Pages = {847--868},
Volume = {90},
Abstract = {This paper uses a new database on foreign aid to examine the relationships among foreign aid, economic policies, and growth of per capita {GDP}. We find that aid has a positive impact on growth in developing countries with good fiscal, monetary, and trade policies but has little effect in the presence of poor policies. Good policies are ones that are themselves important for growth. The quality of policy has only a small impact on the allocation of aid. Our results suggest that aid would be more effective if it were more systematically conditioned on good policy.},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2000 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\2Q463KRC\\Burnside and Dollar - 2000 - Aid, Policies, and Growth.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/117311},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{button_power_2013,
Title = {Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience},
Author = {Button, Katherine S and Ioannidis, John PA and Mokrysz, Claire and Nosek, Brian A and Flint, Jonathan and Robinson, Emma SJ and Munaf{\`o}, Marcus R},
Journal = {Nature Reviews Neuroscience},
Year = {2013},
Number = {5},
Pages = {365--376},
Volume = {14},
Publisher = {Nature Publishing Group}
}
@Article{camfield_three_2013,
Title = {Three R's of Econometrics: Repetition, Reproduction and Replication},
Author = {Camfield, Laura and Palmer-Jones, Richard},
Journal = {Journal of Development Studies},
Year = {2013},
Number = {12},
Pages = {1607--1614},
Volume = {49},
Abstract = {Development economics has become increasingly quantified in recent years, reflecting the aspirations of economists to practise hard science. We argue that standard applied econometric methodology lacks one key feature of the claim of science to be scientific, namely replication as part of independent confirmation of findings. Replication plays a large role in understanding the confidence we can place in the quantitative studies on which much policy advice rests, which is particularly salient in a {UK} context given the emphasis placed on evidence-based policy-making by the {UK} Department for International Development.},
Doi = {10.1080/00220388.2013.807504},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\B3TF5BD3\\Camfield and Palmer-Jones - 2013 - Three ‘Rs’ of Econometrics Repetition, Reproducti.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\XHAG6H2I\\00220388.2013.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0022-0388},
Shorttitle = {Three ‘Rs’ of Econometrics},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.807504},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{card_minimum_2000,
Title = {Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Reply},
Author = {Card, David and Krueger, Alan B.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {2000},
Month = dec,
Number = {5},
Pages = {1397--1420},
Volume = {90},
Copyright = {Copyright © 2000 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\8UMCAMVW\\Card and Krueger - 2000 - Minimum Wages and Employment A Case Study of the .pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Shorttitle = {Minimum Wages and Employment},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677856},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{card1995time,
Title = {Time-series minimum-wage studies: a meta-analysis},
Author = {Card, David and Krueger, Alan B},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {1995},
Pages = {238--243},
Publisher = {JSTOR}
}
@Article{card_minimum_1994,
Title = {Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania},
Author = {Card, David and Krueger, Alan B.},
Journal = {The American Economic Review},
Year = {1994},
Month = sep,
Number = {4},
Pages = {772--793},
Volume = {84},
Abstract = {On April 1, 1992, New Jersey's minimum wage rose from \$4.25 to \$5.05 per hour. To evaluate the impact of the law we surveyed 410 fast-food restaurants in New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania before and after the rise. Comparisons of employment growth at stores in New Jersey and Pennsylvania (where the minimum wage was constant) provide simple estimates of the effect of the higher minimum wage. We also compare employment changes at stores in New Jersey that were initially paying high wages (above \$5) to the changes at lower-wage stores. We find no indication that the rise in the minimum wage reduced employment.},
Copyright = {Copyright © 1994 American Economic Association},
File = {JSTOR Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\3GJU4UC9\\Card and Krueger - 1994 - Minimum Wages and Employment A Case Study of the .pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0002-8282},
Shorttitle = {Minimum Wages and Employment},
Url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118030},
Urldate = {2014-08-20}
}
@Article{Card1992minwage,
Title = {Using Regional Variation in Wages to Measure the Effects of the Federal Minimum Wage},
Author = {Card, David AND Alan B Krueger},
Journal = {Industrial \& Labor Relations Review},
Year = {1992},
Month = {October},
Number = {1},
Pages = {22-37},
Volume = {46},
Owner = {garret},
Timestamp = {2015.07.03}
}
@Article{carey_noted_2011,
Title = {Noted Dutch Psychologist, Stapel, Accused of Research Fraud},
Author = {Carey, Benedict},
Journal = {The New York Times},
Year = {2011},
Month = nov,
Abstract = {A Dutch scholar was found to have falsified findings in dozens of papers, in a field that critics say is vulnerable to such abuses.},
Chapter = {Health / Research},
File = {New York Times Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\HJIS8BZD\\noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0362-4331},
Keywords = {Falsification of Data, Frauds and Swindling, Psychology and Psychologists, Research, Stapel, Diederik},
Url = {http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html},
Urldate = {2014-09-12}
}
@Article{carpenter_psychologys_2012,
Title = {Psychology's Bold Initiative},
Author = {Carpenter, Siri},
Journal = {Science},
Year = {2012},
Month = mar,
Number = {6076},
Pages = {1558--1561},
Volume = {335},
Abstract = {Some psychology researchers argue that a scientific culture that too heavily favors new and counterintuitive ideas over the confirmation of existing results has led to too many findings that are striking for their novelty and published in respected journals—but are nonetheless false. A new online site ({PsychFileDrawer}.org) lets psychologists post results of replications of experiments—whether they succeed or fail—that would ordinarily never leave their file drawer because most journals decline to publish straightforward replication studies. And a group of more than 50 academic psychologists, which calls itself the Open Science Collaboration, has begun an unprecedented, large-scale project to systematically replicate psychological experiments recently published in leading journals. Some researchers are optimistic that many published findings will be replicated. But others are concerned that if the project confirms few studies, it could unfairly indict psychology. Indeed, the prospect of exposing psychology's foibles has upset some scientists.},
Doi = {10.1126/science.335.6076.1558},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\6E47UU9Q\\Carpenter - 2012 - Psychology's Bold Initiative.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\WNTFGWVE\\1558.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
Language = {en},
Pmid = {22461583},
Url = {http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6076/1558},
Urldate = {2014-09-08}
}
@Article{casey_reshaping_2012,
Title = {Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan*},
Author = {Casey, Katherine and Glennerster, Rachel and Miguel, Edward},
Journal = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
Year = {2012},
Month = nov,
Number = {4},
Pages = {1755--1812},
Volume = {127},
Abstract = {Despite their importance, there is limited evidence on how institutions can be strengthened. Evaluating the effects of specific reforms is complicated by the lack of exogenous variation in institutions, the difficulty of measuring institutional performance, and the temptation to “cherry pick� estimates from among the large number of indicators required to capture this multifaceted subject. We evaluate one attempt to make local institutions more democratic and egalitarian by imposing participation requirements for marginalized groups (including women) and test for learning-by-doing effects. We exploit the random assignment of a governance program in Sierra Leone, develop innovative real-world outcome measures, and use a preanalysis plan ({PAP}) to bind our hands against data mining. The intervention studied is a “community-driven development� program, which has become a popular strategy for foreign aid donors. We find positive short-run effects on local public goods and economic outcomes, but no evidence for sustained impacts on collective action, decision making, or the involvement of marginalized groups, suggesting that the intervention did not durably reshape local institutions. We discuss the practical trade-offs faced in implementing a {PAP} and show how in its absence we could have generated two divergent, equally erroneous interpretations of program impacts on institutions. {JEL} Codes: F35, H41, O4},
Doi = {10.1093/qje/qje027},
File = {Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\MHIPH78X\\1755.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0033-5533, 1531-4650},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {Reshaping Institutions},
Url = {http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/content/127/4/1755},
Urldate = {2014-08-26}
}
@Article{chambers2014instead,
Title = {Instead of" playing the game" it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond},
Author = {Chambers, Christopher D and Feredoes, Eva and Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh Daniel and Etchells, Peter},
Journal = {AIMS Neuroscience},
Year = {2014},
Number = {1},
Pages = {4--17},
Volume = {1},
Publisher = {AIMS Press}
}
@Article{chan_a_empirical_2004,
Title = {Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles},
Author = {{Chan A} and {Hrbjartsson A} and {Haahr MT} and {Gtzsche PC} and {Altman DG}},
Journal = {{JAMA}},
Year = {2004},
Month = may,
Number = {20},
Pages = {2457--2465},
Volume = {291},
Abstract = {Context Selective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the
nature or direction of their results has been widely suspected, but direct
evidence of such bias is currently limited to case reports.Objective To study empirically the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias
in a cohort of randomized trials.Design Cohort study using protocols and published reports of randomized trials
approved by the Scientific-Ethical Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg,
Denmark, in 1994-1995. The number and characteristics of reported and unreported
trial outcomes were recorded from protocols, journal articles, and a survey
of trialists. An outcome was considered incompletely reported if insufficient
data were presented in the published articles for meta-analysis. Odds ratios
relating the completeness of outcome reporting to statistical significance
were calculated for each trial and then pooled to provide an overall estimate
of bias. Protocols and published articles were also compared to identify discrepancies
in primary outcomes.Main Outcome Measures Completeness of reporting of efficacy and harm outcomes and of statistically
significant vs nonsignificant outcomes; consistency between primary outcomes
defined in the most recent protocols and those defined in published articles.Results One hundred two trials with 122 published journal articles and 3736
outcomes were identified. Overall, 50\% of efficacy and 65\% of harm outcomes
per trial were incompletely reported. Statistically significant outcomes had
a higher odds of being fully reported compared with nonsignificant outcomes
for both efficacy (pooled odds ratio, 2.4; 95\% confidence interval [{CI}], 1.4-4.0)
and harm (pooled odds ratio, 4.7; 95\% {CI}, 1.8-12.0) data. In comparing published
articles with protocols, 62\% of trials had at least 1 primary outcome that
was changed, introduced, or omitted. Eighty-six percent of survey responders
(42/49) denied the existence of unreported outcomes despite clear evidence
to the contrary.Conclusions The reporting of trial outcomes is not only frequently incomplete but
also biased and inconsistent with protocols. Published articles, as well as
reviews that incorporate them, may therefore be unreliable and overestimate
the benefits of an intervention. To ensure transparency, planned trials should
be registered and protocols should be made publicly available prior to trial
completion.},
Doi = {10.1001/jama.291.20.2457},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\AFKZWBJ7\\Chan A et al. - 2004 - Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outc.pdf:application/pdf},
ISSN = {0098-7484},
Shorttitle = {Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.20.2457},
Urldate = {2014-10-09}
}
@Article{chan_spirit_2013,
Title = {{SPIRIT} 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials},
Author = {Chan, A.-W. and Tetzlaff, J. M. and Gotzsche, P. C. and Altman, D. G. and Mann, H. and Berlin, J. A. and Dickersin, K. and Hrobjartsson, A. and Schulz, K. F. and Parulekar, W. R. and Krleza-Jeric, K. and Laupacis, A. and Moher, D.},
Journal = {{BMJ}},
Year = {2013},
Month = jan,
Number = {jan08 15},
Pages = {e7586--e7586},
Volume = {346},
Doi = {10.1136/bmj.e7586},
ISSN = {1756-1833},
Language = {en},
Shorttitle = {{SPIRIT} 2013 explanation and elaboration},
Url = {http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.e7586},
Urldate = {2014-10-09}
}
@Article{chemin_response_2012,
Title = {Response to High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations},
Author = {Chemin, Matthieu},
Journal = {Journal of Development Studies},
Year = {2012},
Number = {12},
Pages = {1881--1885},
Volume = {48},
Abstract = {Abstract Duvendack and Palmer-Jones are critical of analysis and conclusions in Chemin (2008) because they are unable to replicate my results. This response identifies key differences between the two papers, especially regarding the sample and measurement of variables, which imply that Duvendack and Paler-Jones should not be considered as either a replication or a criticism of my work.},
Doi = {10.1080/00220388.2012.727561},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\48233AME\\Chemin - 2012 - Response to ‘High Noon for Microfinance Impact Eva.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\WG76XX86\\00220388.2012.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0022-0388},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.727561},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{chemin_benefits_2008,
Title = {The Benefits and Costs of Microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh},
Author = {Chemin, Matthieu},
Journal = {Journal of Development Studies},
Year = {2008},
Number = {4},
Pages = {463--484},
Volume = {44},
Abstract = {Abstract Using the latest developments from the evaluation literature, namely the technique of matching, this paper shows a positive, but lower than previously thought, effect of microfinance on expenditure per capita, supply of labour, and level of school enrolment for boys and girls. For instance, participants spend 3 per cent more on average than non-participants in control villages. This paper also takes into account repayment delays to calculate the cost of credit provision. It shows how a better investigation at the individual level of the benefits brought and the cost borne could help microfinance institutions to better select their customers. {JEL} Classification : C14, D10, G21, I38, O12, O16},
Doi = {10.1080/00220380701846735},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\A2VH4E68\\Chemin - 2008 - The Benefits and Costs of Microfinance Evidence f.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\B967ER6G\\00220380701846735.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0022-0388},
Shorttitle = {The Benefits and Costs of Microfinance},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220380701846735},
Urldate = {2014-08-21}
}
@Article{ciccone_economic_2011,
Title = {Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: A Comment},
Author = {Ciccone, Antonio},
Journal = {American Economic Journal: Applied Economics},
Year = {2011},
Month = oct,
Number = {4},
Pages = {215--227},
Volume = {3},
Abstract = {Edward Miguel, Shanker Satyanath, and Ernest Sergenti (2004), henceforth {MSS}, argue that lower rainfall levels and negative rainfall shocks increase conflict risk in sub-Saharan Africa. This conclusion rests on their finding of a negative correlation between conflict in t and rainfall growth between t – 1 and t – 2. I show that this finding is driven by a (counterintuitive) positive correlation between conflict in t and rainfall levels in t – 2. If lower rainfall levels or negative rainfall shocks increased conflict, {MSS}'s finding should have been due to a negative correlation between conflict in t and rainfall levels in t – 1. In the latest data, conflict is unrelated to rainfall.},
Doi = {10.1257/app.3.4.215},
Shorttitle = {Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict}
}
@Article{collaboration_open_2012,
Title = {An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science},
Author = {Collaboration, Open Science},
Journal = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
Year = {2012},
Month = nov,
Number = {6},
Pages = {657--660},
Volume = {7},
Abstract = {Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practiced or published. The Reproducibility Project is an open, large-scale, collaborative effort to systematically examine the rate and predictors of reproducibility in psychological science. So far, 72 volunteer researchers from 41 institutions have organized to openly and transparently replicate studies published in three prominent psychological journals in 2008. Multiple methods will be used to evaluate the findings, calculate an empirical rate of replication, and investigate factors that predict reproducibility. Whatever the result, a better understanding of reproducibility will ultimately improve confidence in scientific methodology and findings.},
Doi = {10.1177/1745691612462588},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\JFFM4EBN\\Collaboration - 2012 - An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Esti.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\KVKQRFJ8\\657.html:text/html},
ISSN = {1745-6916, 1745-6924},
Keywords = {methodology, open, psychological science, replication, reproducibility},
Language = {en},
Url = {http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6/657},
Urldate = {2014-09-08}
}
@Book{openmaximizing,
Title = {Maximizing the Reproducibility of Your Research},
Author = {Open Science Collaboration and others},
Editor = {Lilienfield, S.O. and Waldman, I.D.},
Publisher = {Wiley},
Year = {2014},
Address = {New York, NY},
Journal = {Psychological science under scrutiny: Recent challenges and proposed solutions.},
Url = {https://osf.io/nte3j/}
}
@Article{cyranoski_cloning_2014,
Title = {Cloning comeback},
Author = {Cyranoski, David},
Journal = {Nature},
Year = {2014},
Month = jan,
Number = {7484},
Pages = {468--471},
Volume = {505},
Doi = {10.1038/505468a},
File = {Cloning comeback \: Nature News & Comment:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\PCNSJG73\\cloning-comeback-1.html:text/html},
ISSN = {0028-0836, 1476-4687},
Url = {http://www.nature.com/news/cloning-comeback-1.14504},
Urldate = {2014-09-12}
}
@Article{dahl_rasmussen_walking_2011,
Title = {Walking the talk: the need for a trial registry for development interventions},
Author = {Dahl Rasmussen, Ole and Malchow-Møller, Nikolaj and Barnebeck Andersen, Thomas},
Journal = {Journal of Development Effectiveness},
Year = {2011},
Month = sep,
Number = {4},
Pages = {502--519},
Volume = {3},
Abstract = {Recent advances in the use of randomised control trials to evaluate the effect of development interventions promise to enhance our knowledge of what works and why. A core argument supporting randomised studies is the claim that they have high internal validity. The authors argue that this claim is weak as long as a trial registry of development interventions is not in place. Without a trial registry, the possibilities for data mining, created by analyses of multiple outcomes and subgroups, undermine internal validity. Drawing on experience from evidence-based medicine and recent examples from microfinance, they argue that a trial registry would also enhance external validity and foster innovative research.},
Doi = {10.1080/19439342.2011.605160},
File = {Full Text PDF:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\I3NG7FSN\\Dahl Rasmussen et al. - 2011 - Walking the talk the need for a trial registry fo.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:C\:\\Users\\garret\\AppData\\Roaming\\Mozilla\\Firefox\\Profiles\\vbdhbrhn.default\\zotero\\storage\\2RWVI6V9\\19439342.2011.html:text/html},
ISSN = {1943-9342},
Shorttitle = {Walking the talk},
Url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2011.605160},
Urldate = {2014-08-27}
}
@Article{dal-re_making_2014,
Title = {Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality},
Author = {Dal-Re, Rafael and Ioannidis, John P. and Bracken, Michael B. and Buffler, Patricia A. and Chan, An-Wen and Franco, Eduardo L. and Vecchia, Carlo La and Weiderpass, Elisabete},
Journal = {Science Translational Medicine},
Year = {2014},
Month = feb,
Number = {224},
Pages = {224cm1--224cm1},
Volume = {6},