-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
problem of atom charges in protein PDB files #107
Comments
Pdb format does not always include charges, which is particular problem for ligands, I would suggest using another format better suited for small molecules such as sdf or mol2. Additionally I would suggest not to use |
My ligand is a little peptide including 5 residues and its C-terminal is carboxyl group(COO-),but the O- atom's formal charge is neither minus nor plus. I think its a common problem for protein. So the correctness of salt bridges in interactions module is doubtful. |
Can you upload a sample file I will try to look a at it next week to figure it out |
This is a pdb file. |
A_minius.txt |
Further, I used the test cases in the source code (test_interactions.py). My scripts are:
|
what is the PDB file format in oddt(RSC PDB, charmm PDB)?
I want to calculate interactions (salt bridge, hydrogen bonds, etc ) between a protein and a short peptide which obtained from MD simulations (charmm pdb formats). The peptide C-terminal is carboxyl group (COO-). but when I used the commands below:
ligand = next(oddt.toolkit.readfile('pdb', 'ligand.pdb'))
ligand.protein = True
ligand.atom_dict['isminus']
all atoms are false.
so how oddt decides the charge of atom in pdb format or what special pdb formats needed by oddt?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: