Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OptTrain.java:38-40: Return constant-folding.xsl when... #3120

Open
0pdd opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

OptTrain.java:38-40: Return constant-folding.xsl when... #3120

0pdd opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Apr 19, 2024

The puzzle 3115-d79bda11 from #3115 has to be resolved:

* @todo #3115:30min Return constant-folding.xsl when it's ready. This optimization was removed from
* the train because it's not really ready and works only with `bool` object which was removed. We
* need to make this optimization great again and add to the train.

The puzzle was created by rultor on 19-Apr-24.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

Copy link

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback:

  • The todo message is a little confusing with the use of phrases like "make this optimization great again" and "add to the train". It's unclear what exactly needs to be done to improve the optimization and what it means to add it to the train. A context tip would be to specify exactly what improvements need to be made to the optimization and clarify what adding to the train entails.
  • The todo message doesn't provide any clear steps or actions that need to be taken in order to complete the task. This could cause confusion for anyone trying to pick up the task. A context tip would be to break down the task into clear, actionable steps.
  • There is a lack of information about why the bool object was removed and how this impacts the task at hand. This could cause confusion for anyone trying to understand the state of the codebase and what needs to be done to complete the task. A context tip would be to provide a brief explanation of why the bool object was removed and how this impacts the task.

Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster.
Analyzed with gpt-4

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Apr 19, 2024

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback: * The todo message is a little confusing with the u...

I see you're talking to me, but I can't reply since I'm not a chat bot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant