Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System Tray Icons (Kde/GNOME) #386

Open
RiemaruKarurosu opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

System Tray Icons (Kde/GNOME) #386

RiemaruKarurosu opened this issue Feb 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RiemaruKarurosu
Copy link
Contributor

RiemaruKarurosu commented Feb 21, 2023

It's weird when I close NoiseTorch and you're not sure if it's running on background, this could be weird for new users.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a Systray icon to access noisetorch, like skype or steam one.

KDE
imagen

Gnome SysTray Extension
imagen

Alternative
For gnome there is the new quick settings menu where you could add something like caffeine or GS extension but this solution could be complicated and even GNOME exclusive or not possible with GO

imagen

@RiemaruKarurosu RiemaruKarurosu added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 21, 2023
@TheDukeofErl
Copy link
Collaborator

I think part of this ends up being that when NT is closed it really isn't running in the background anymore, it's just that the ladspa plugin is still up and running. This would probably require some degree of fundamental design changes but I still think that it would be an overall useful thing to have.

In regards to dealing with GNOME, I'd personally rather keep things as cross-platform as possible. I don't know if the GNOME devs have decided that things in the quick settings menu can pull from the normal systray or anything like that, as I haven't used the DE in a long time. That said, like you mentioned, the systray extension works and is included by some distros by default (Ubuntu, Pop, etc). With that in mind, if this is implemented I'd definitely opt towards that solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants