Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nanoplot output files clobber each other .. #233

Open
benbfly opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Nanoplot output files clobber each other .. #233

benbfly opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@benbfly
Copy link

benbfly commented Mar 23, 2023

Description of the bug

When I run 4 samples, I only get one version of the nanoplot output files. It looks like the nanoplot module should use the --prefix command to prefix the generic output file names with the sample IDs or sample names, so that they will be unique and not clobber each other.

Command used and terminal output

No response

Relevant files

No response

System information

Docker/Azure/Tower
Workflow:
Nextflow: 22.10.7
nf-core/nanoseq: 3.1.0

@benbfly benbfly added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 23, 2023
@ktrappe
Copy link

ktrappe commented Mar 24, 2023

Actually, NanoComp https://github.com/wdecoster/nanocomp might be the better option here.

@ktrappe
Copy link

ktrappe commented Mar 27, 2023

nf-core/modules#3110

@Caffeinated-Code
Copy link

Following up on this as I have the same issue.
Do we have a newer version of the pipeline that prefixes sample names to Nanoplot outputs or uses Nanocomp?
Version: nf-core/nanoseq v3.1.0 (seems to match with the latest version on github)

@Caffeinated-Code
Copy link

Hi,
Hope you are doing well!
Wanted to reach out and check if this bug has been fixed in the current version or when we can expect an update.

Much Thanks!
Swathi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants