Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error after updating to 2.10.1 #584

Closed
DenuxPlays opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 14 comments
Closed

Error after updating to 2.10.1 #584

DenuxPlays opened this issue Dec 28, 2023 · 14 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@DenuxPlays
Copy link

DenuxPlays commented Dec 28, 2023

Describe the bug
Updated from 2.10.0 to 2.10.1 and got the following error:

image

Everything worked fine before.

The thing I did was:

docker compose down -v
docker compose pull
docker compose up -d

Used docker compose with the following file:

version: "3.8"
services:
  wakapi:
    image: ghcr.io/muety/wakapi:latest
    restart: unless-stopped
    container_name: wakapi
    ports:
      - "127.0.0.1:7523:3000"
    volumes:
      - ./data:/data
    environment:
      WAKAPI_PASSWORD_SALT: ${WAKAPI_PASSWORD_SALT}
      WAKAPI_PUBLIC_URL: ${WAKAPI_PUBLIC_URL}
      WAKAPI_DB_HOST: db
      WAKAPI_DB_PORT: 3306
      WAKAPI_DB_USER: ${DATABASE_USERNAME}
      WAKAPI_DB_PASSWORD: ${DATABASE_PASSWORD}
      WAKAPI_DB_NAME: ${DATABASE_NAME}
      WAKAPI_DB_TYPE: mysql
    depends_on:
      db:
        condition: service_healthy

  db:
    image: mariadb:latest
    restart: unless-stopped
    volumes:
      - ./db:/var/lib/mysql
    environment:
      MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: ${DATABASE_ROOT_PASSWORD}
      MYSQL_USER: ${DATABASE_USERNAME}
      MYSQL_PASSWORD: ${DATABASE_PASSWORD}
      MYSQL_DATABASE: ${DATABASE_NAME}
      TZ: ${TZ}
    healthcheck:
      test: [ 'CMD', '/usr/local/bin/healthcheck.sh', '--innodb_initialized' ]
      timeout: 5s
      interval: 5s
      retries: 5
@DenuxPlays
Copy link
Author

After updating the tag to 2.10.0 everything works fine.

@DenuxPlays
Copy link
Author

I can reproduce it with a clean install.
Host is running Fedora 39 (both on my server where the error occurred the first time and on my laptop)

@Totto16
Copy link

Totto16 commented Dec 29, 2023

Same here, 2.10.0 works, 2.10.1 not 😓

@eli-yip
Copy link

eli-yip commented Dec 29, 2023

Same problem, 2.10.0 works fine.

@bboysoulcn
Copy link

same

@YC
Copy link
Collaborator

YC commented Dec 29, 2023

This seems like an issue from upgrading configor.

listen_ipv4: 127.0.0.1              # leave blank to disable ipv4
listen_ipv6:                     # leave blank to disable ipv6

1.2.1:

2023-12-29T16:13:56.82323559+11:00 [INFO ] 👉 Listening for HTTP on 127.0.0.1:3000... ✅

The value of listen_ipv6 is blank.

1.2.2:

2023-12-29T16:12:56.344460922+11:00 [INFO ] 👉 Listening for HTTP on 127.0.0.1:3000... ✅
2023-12-29T16:12:56.344470121+11:00 [INFO ] 👉 Listening for HTTP on [::1]:3000... ✅

The value of listen_ipv6 is ::1.

@YC YC added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 29, 2023
YC added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 29, 2023
@xMdb
Copy link

xMdb commented Dec 29, 2023

CR using Docker :latest tag (2.10.1)
image

@muety
Copy link
Owner

muety commented Dec 29, 2023

Waking up to 13 unread e-mails from a GitHub issue is a great start into the day! 😄 First of all, please apologize these inconveniences! Should have tested in Docker before releasing... Also, thanks a lot to @YC for reacting so promptly!

I took a look at this issue and here's a short summary:

  • configor upgraded its dependency of yaml to v3 (already 11 months ago, but apparently they put a new tag only now)
  • Either related to that version upgrade or due to a change in the library itself, empty YAML values won't override default values anymore (not even when omitempty flag is set), which is somewhat confusing behavior imo.
  • Because Docker doesn't have IPv6, we disable listening on a v6 interface during the build process, by setting listen_ipv6 to an empty string see here, while the default is still ::1 (see here)
  • After the previously mentioned change, the default will still take precedence

Workaround: Pass -e WAKAPI_LISTEN_IPV6='-' to docker run.

Solution: I'll push a new image in a second.

@muety muety closed this as completed in a1e27f1 Dec 29, 2023
@muety
Copy link
Owner

muety commented Dec 29, 2023

Opened jinzhu/configor#89.

@libukai
Copy link

libukai commented Jan 8, 2024

After upgrading to 2.10.2, in the Docker logs, I can see the reported heartbeat data, but there is no record or error in the PostgreSQL database.

CleanShot 2024-01-08 at 17 02 31@2x

CleanShot 2024-01-08 at 17 01 36@2x

@libukai
Copy link

libukai commented Jan 8, 2024

Even if downgraded to 2.10.0, it is still unable to record data. Is it because the database structure was damaged during the upgrade process? However, currently, it seems that the historical data is still intact, only the new data cannot be recorded.

@DenuxPlays
Copy link
Author

Even if downgraded to 2.10.0, it is still unable to record data. Is it because the database structure was damaged during the upgrade process? However, currently, it seems that the historical data is still intact, only the new data cannot be recorded.

I guess you should open a new issue for that.
Seems unrelated as I had no problems since 2.10.2

@muety
Copy link
Owner

muety commented Jan 8, 2024

There haven't been any changes to the database schema or the heartbeats ingestion mechanism between 2.10.0 and 2.10.2. No idea why you neither get the heartbeats, nor an error message. If the endpoint returns 201, it means everything went well on the way.

Can you please double-check, if:

  • ... there are no entries in the heartbeats table after the point in time where you upgraded
  • ... the heartbeats endpoint returns an empty list after that point in time
  • ... the summary on your dashboard shows zero hours since then

@libukai
Copy link

libukai commented Jan 9, 2024

Today everything is back to normal, including yesterday's data..

Thank you for your reply, thank you for open sourcing such a useful tool

@muety muety mentioned this issue Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants