Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Re-evaluate the MEP process in 2024 April #1060

Open
wks opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Re-evaluate the MEP process in 2024 April #1060

wks opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
P-high Priority: High. A high-priority issue should be fixed as soon as possible.

Comments

@wks
Copy link
Collaborator

wks commented Jan 2, 2024

We agreed to give the MEP process a try for 3 months. After that, we should re-evaluate the MEP process and make appropriate adjustments. That will happen in early April.
@caizixian caizixian changed the title Re-evaluate the MEP process in April Re-evaluate the MEP process in 2024 April Jan 5, 2024
@qinsoon qinsoon added the P-high Priority: High. A high-priority issue should be fixed as soon as possible. label Jan 17, 2024
@wks
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wks commented Jan 31, 2024

After going through an MEP and discussing details, we shall ask if anyone oppose the MEP. If no one opposes the MEP in the meeting, we say we tentatively reached consensus on this MEP, and we shall wait for 24 hours for anyone to post their objections. If we do not receive any objection during that period, we shall declare that the MEP passes the review.

@wks
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wks commented Feb 2, 2024

I have added labels MEP-accepted and MEP-rejected for accepted or rejected MEPs, respectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
P-high Priority: High. A high-priority issue should be fixed as soon as possible.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wks @qinsoon