Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[LRNRQ] Add gam from package mgcv (type surv) #63

Open
5 of 8 tasks
pierrecamilleri opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
5 of 8 tasks

[LRNRQ] Add gam from package mgcv (type surv) #63

pierrecamilleri opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@bblodfon
Labels
Learner Status: Accepted Accepted learner requests, pre-development.

Comments

@pierrecamilleri
Copy link
Contributor

Algorithm

Generalized additive model

Package

mgcv

Supported types

  • classif
  • regr
  • surv
  • dens

I have checked that this is not already implemented in

  • mlr3
  • mlr3learners
  • mlr3extralearners
  • Other core packages (e.g. mlr3proba)

Why do I think this is a useful learner?

mgcv::gam is already implemented (#61) in mlr3extralearners for classification and regression, so it should be relatively easy to adapt for survival analysis.

Further Optional Comments
@pierrecamilleri pierrecamilleri added the Learner Status: Request For requesting a new learner label Mar 11, 2021
@RaphaelS1 RaphaelS1 added Learner Status: Accepted Accepted learner requests, pre-development. and removed Learner Status: Request For requesting a new learner labels Mar 11, 2021
@RaphaelS1 RaphaelS1 mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2021
Closed
8 tasks
@loveyu3317
Copy link

good job!

@sebffischer
Copy link
Sponsor Member

@bblodfon Maybe you are also interested in contributing this learner?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bblodfon bblodfon

Labels
Learner Status: Accepted Accepted learner requests, pre-development.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@bblodfon @sebffischer @pierrecamilleri @RaphaelS1 @loveyu3317