We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, I find a bug of OverlapPair: div1 and div2 are wrong when 'overlap type' isn't 'nt'.
Here is an example: java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i aa sample1.txt sample2.txt aa/result java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i nt sample1.txt sample2.txt nt/result java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i strict sample1.txt sample2.txt strict/result
$ cat nt/result.paired.nt.summary.txt | cut -f1-6 1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21 sample1 sample2 62917 76574 4236 4236
$ cat aa/result.paired.aa.summary.txt | cut -f1-6 1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21 sample1 sample2 62917 76574 5392 5392
$ cat strict/result.paired.strict.summary.txt | cut -f1-6 1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21 sample1 sample2 62917 76574 4096 4096
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi, I find a bug of OverlapPair: div1 and div2 are wrong when 'overlap type' isn't 'nt'.
Here is an example:
java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i aa sample1.txt sample2.txt aa/result
java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i nt sample1.txt sample2.txt nt/result
java -jar vdjtools.jar OverlapPair -i strict sample1.txt sample2.txt strict/result
$ cat nt/result.paired.nt.summary.txt | cut -f1-6
1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21
sample1 sample2 62917 76574 4236 4236
$ cat aa/result.paired.aa.summary.txt | cut -f1-6
1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21
sample1 sample2 62917 76574 5392 5392
$ cat strict/result.paired.strict.summary.txt | cut -f1-6
1_sample_id 2_sample_id div1 div2 div12 div21
sample1 sample2 62917 76574 4096 4096
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: