Skip to content

Branching multiline syntax - modified micromark-extension-gfm-table #113

Answered by wooorm
TRIAEIOU asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks!

Rather, I would like to modify the micromark-extension-gfm-table so that it matches all the versions.

I am most likely against a PR to add support for non-GFM features to GFM extensions. It is already very hard to maintain extensions that match GFM. And tables are very complex. But GFM is necessary.
I also think extending markdown with new features is generally a bad idea. See the chapter on Extensions in the micromark readme for more of my thoughts.

// However I never seem to end up here

This is perhaps because actual tables are used first?

Is attempt the correct way to go to first try one pattern, then another etc.?

Attempt can indeed be used to try one path, and do someth…

Replies: 1 comment 7 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
7 replies
@TRIAEIOU
Comment options

@TRIAEIOU
Comment options

@wooorm
Comment options

@TRIAEIOU
Comment options

@TRIAEIOU
Comment options

Answer selected by TRIAEIOU
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants