-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Performance #45
Comments
May you pack this into a ZIP so I can check it on my machine? BTW I find this very very strange, the last time I ran the tests in my own machine I got all of them green in less than 2 seconds. My machine is an Athlon II X3@3,2GHz, 14GB RAM DDR, ... from 2010. I've seen the other guy on #44 which has opted to don't use TrackerDog because of perf issues too. I'm surprised about these results. Please give me the source into a ZIP attached to some comment so I can test it on my machine too and see what's going on |
In fact, I've done a test run hosted in VSTS and I got this result for the entire test run:
|
It is uploaded to https://github.com/mr-at0s/trackerdogperf |
Ok thanks, I'll try it and I'll give you feedback |
I added TrackerDog to our project to track entity objects and I discovered that
CreateFrom
consumes about 2-3 seconds on a solid developer machine (release build).I created a small example and made some measurements. I still see similar results. Is it known than TrackerDog consumes quite a bit CPU time? Why is this? Or am I using it wrong?
Example Code:
Results:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: