Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: add support for CGAL #18

Open
jabooth opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Proposal: add support for CGAL #18

jabooth opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@jabooth
Copy link
Member

jabooth commented Oct 29, 2015

CGAL seems like a pretty solid library for performing lots of geometric tasks.

It's like VTK, but purely focused on accurate computation.

For instance, they have a nice efficient surface intersection object:
http://doc.cgal.org/latest/AABB_tree/

The benchmarks seem promising. I'm wondering if it is worth making CGAL a dependency and wrapping methods to get high performance utilities for our 3D deformable modelling work.

@patricksnape
Copy link
Contributor

I am sure they are already some Python wrappers of CGAL, maybe this.

I think the problem with CGAL is that it is heavily templated, so it might end up being like dlib where you have to pick and choose what API to expose.

@patricksnape
Copy link
Contributor

This is on conda-forge now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants