svg.attributes.word-spacing - Supported on Firefox Android

[eyaler]

What type of issue is this?

Incorrect support data (example: BrowserX says "86" but support was added in "40")

What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?

The word-spacing SVG attribute is supported on Firefox Android, but BCD reports it is not.

What browsers does this problem apply to, if applicable?

Firefox Android

What did you expect to see?

79

Did you test this? If so, how?

The CSS property indicates that it is supported: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/word-spacing

Can you link to any release notes, bugs, pull requests, or MDN pages related to this?

No response

Do you have anything more you want to share?

No response

MDN URL

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Attribute/word-spacing

MDN metadata

MDN page report details

• Query: svg.global_attributes.word-spacing
• Report started: 2024-04-19T15:44:25.502Z

[github-actions]

This issue was automatically closed because the title was left as the default, and a summary was not added.

If this is not a spam issue, please replace the <SUMMARIZE THE PROBLEM> part of the title with a short summary of the reported issue, and then post a follow-up comment. A maintainer will review your issue and reopen it if needed.

[eyaler]

This issue was automatically closed because the title was left as the default, and a summary was not added.

If this is not a spam issue, please replace the <SUMMARIZE THE PROBLEM> part of the title with a short summary of the reported issue, and then post a follow-up comment. A maintainer will review your issue and reopen it if needed.

fixed please reopen

[queengooborg]

This looks like it's trying to report a browser bug, rather than an issue with the compatibility tables on MDN, but there is not enough details to verify this or perform any action. If this is a compatibility table issue, please provide as much detail as possible. If this is a browser bug, please report it at https://bugzil.la.

[eyaler]

nope. this is an issue with the comp. table.
value should read 79.

[queengooborg]

Can you provide supporting details to show why it should be 79 and not 4?

[eyaler]

The "No" here:

Should be changed to "79" as in:

[queengooborg]

Ah, I was looking at the wrong page, my bad. Reopening and updating the report accordingly.