Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] HCT tone: why not use CAM16 "J" lightness? #112

Open
Artoria2e5 opened this issue Aug 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Question] HCT tone: why not use CAM16 "J" lightness? #112

Artoria2e5 opened this issue Aug 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
explain (Label used internally)

Comments

@Artoria2e5
Copy link

Artoria2e5 commented Aug 5, 2023

The Science of Color & Design explains why HCT uses CAM16 Ch instead of CIELAB chroma:

You may wonder why we didn’t just use L*a*b*’s hue and chroma measures, then, we could have just use L*a*b*! However, when we tried using it in design, L*a*b* was too inconsistent perceptually.

But the article does not explain why HCT doesn't use CAM16 J for the "tone" value instead of CIELAB L*. Wouldn't we have the same benefit of only working with one standard color system and not having to glue together L* and Ch in the solver?


Yeah, this is to get a quotable response to add to Wikipedia. But I'm also actually curious: is being able to get the contrast from the XYZ (skipping the CAM) that useful? Maybe there's some reasoning I've missed here?

@pennzht pennzht added bug Something isn't working explain (Label used internally) and removed bug Something isn't working labels Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
explain (Label used internally)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants