You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
# v2.7.1
# ./Infomap -v -o tree --out-name <fileName> --two-level --directed --seed 2501 <graph> <directory>
# started at 2023-07-25 17:41:35
# completed in 4.5618 s
# partitioned into 2 levels with 3606 top modules
# codelength 9.47955 bits
# relative codelength savings 29.0945%
The compiled version has this output
# v2.7.1
# ./Infomap -v -o tree --out-name <fileName_compiled> --two-level --directed --seed 2501 <graph> <directory>
# started at 2023-07-25 19:57:13
# completed in 2.70225 s
# partitioned into 2 levels with 3614 top modules
# codelength 9.48069 bits
# relative codelength savings 29.086%
The machine (Apple M1max on Ventura) has OpenMP enabled. The graph is a simple unweighted graph.
Is the slightly different output behavior somehow to be expected or should I use different parameters? Thank you.
Additional information: The binary behaved the same on three different Macs and the compiled Infomap was consistent with a compilation on another Mac. Just in case it's relevant, the compilation produced a warning:
The binary version output looks like this
The compiled version has this output
The machine (Apple M1max on Ventura) has OpenMP enabled. The graph is a simple unweighted graph.
Is the slightly different output behavior somehow to be expected or should I use different parameters? Thank you.
Additional information: The binary behaved the same on three different Macs and the compiled Infomap was consistent with a compilation on another Mac. Just in case it's relevant, the compilation produced a warning:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: