Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

It seems can't work in my ubuntu 20.04 #323

Open
JalorOo opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

It seems can't work in my ubuntu 20.04 #323

JalorOo opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@JalorOo
Copy link

JalorOo commented Mar 22, 2024

I use the lsmod | grep rtw, the output as follow:

rtw_8852ce             16384  0
rtw_8852c             974848  1 rtw_8852ce
rtw89pci               81920  1 rtw_8852ce
rtw89core             765952  2 rtw_8852c,rtw89pci
mac80211             1249280  2 rtw89pci,rtw89core
cfg80211              970752  3 rtw_8852c,rtw89core,mac80211

the dmesg.txt is follow:
dmesg.txt

What should i do?

@JalorOo
Copy link
Author

JalorOo commented Mar 22, 2024

run lspci -nn | grep -i net

05:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8125 2.5GbE Controller [10ec:8125] (rev 05)
06:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:c852] (rev 01)

@lwfinger
Copy link
Owner

There is a problem with Ubuntu 20.04. The workaround is in #320. The clue was the line that said:
[ 3.832328] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 567 at net/wireless/core.c:879 wiphy_register+0xa5a/0xa80 [cfg80211]
I am still trying to sort that out, but I have more pressing problems at the moment.

@JalorOo
Copy link
Author

JalorOo commented Mar 23, 2024

There is a problem with Ubuntu 20.04. The workaround is in #320. The clue was the line that said:

[ 3.832328] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 567 at net/wireless/core.c:879 wiphy_register+0xa5a/0xa80 [cfg80211]

I am still trying to sort that out, but I have more pressing problems at the moment.

Ok,thank you, If you had solved this problem, please let me know. Although my problem has not been solved at present, thank you very much for developing this driver

@JalorOo
Copy link
Author

JalorOo commented Mar 24, 2024

in the rtw89 folder use terminal input git chekcout 6dc944, then make and sudo maker install it work!!!

pgj added a commit to pgj/freebsd-wifibox-alpine that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
The 20240310 snapshot of `rtw89` does not work for 8852BE cards.
Similar problems were reported upstream for older Ubuntu versions
and as a fix it was suggested to move back to an older version.

Although the kernel that Wifibox/Alpine uses is much more recent
than one could find in Ubuntu 20.04, the same resolution still
works.  Based on that, chances are likely that the scope of the
regression in the `rtw89` driver is wider than assumed.

The proposed version was verified to be working, so go back to
and stick to it until the issue is resolved in upstream.

References:
- lwfinger/rtw89#320
- lwfinger/rtw89#323
pgj added a commit to pgj/freebsd-wifibox-alpine that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
The 20240310 snapshot of `rtw89` does not work for 8852BE cards.
Similar problems were reported upstream for older Ubuntu versions
and as a fix it was suggested to move back to an older version.

Although the kernel that Wifibox/Alpine uses is much more recent
than one could find in Ubuntu 20.04, the same resolution still
works.  Based on that, chances are likely that the scope of the
regression in the `rtw89` driver is wider than assumed.

The proposed version was verified to be working, so go back to
and stick to it until the issue is resolved in upstream.

References:
- lwfinger/rtw89#320
- lwfinger/rtw89#323
pgj added a commit to pgj/freebsd-wifibox-alpine that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
The 20240310 snapshot of `rtw89` does not work for 8852BE cards.
Similar problems were reported upstream for older Ubuntu versions
and as a fix it was suggested to move back to an older version.

Although the kernel that Wifibox/Alpine uses is much more recent
than one could find in Ubuntu 20.04, the same resolution still
works.  Based on that, chances are likely that the scope of the
regression in the `rtw89` driver is wider than assumed.

The proposed version was verified to be working, so go back to
and stick to it until the issue is resolved in upstream.

References:
- lwfinger/rtw89#320
- lwfinger/rtw89#323
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants