-
Hi,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 7 comments 22 replies
-
I got round my difficulty by storing the people concerned in a dynamic group and using #_IS_USER_IN_GROUP{xxx}. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have an other issue. When I create the dynamic group I choose the value '1' but I have in this group also those who have the value 11,12,13 etc |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, I've downloaded the development version and everything looks fine from my end. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've also downloaded the dev version to the prod site. The behavior is not quite the same. The dynamic group is correct, but you have to remember to select "Exact", which was not memorized when the group was created from the "Member" screen. The selection on the 'Member' screen doesn't work properly; the 'Exact' tick box doesn't seem to be taken into account. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In fact, there's a problem with the dynamic group too. Only the number of people is correct, but in fact the group contains extra people who shouldn't be there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have found a difference between the local and prod site. On the first one the type of the custom member field is 'texte' and it was 'Number(HTML5)' on the prod. Could this be why things work differently? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
indeed, more things (it is still in test :-) )
The latest dev should fix this (also group edit lost the dynamic property, should be fixed too)