You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@lh3, I'm curious to know , whether we can convert GFA to rGFA? . As per rGFA format, we need to maintain 3 additional information along with each segment lines (S). So,
Assuming we have GFA with segments links;
S s1 AAT
S s2 T
can't we just add ;
S s1 AAT LN:i:3 SN:Z:chr1 SO:i:90374744 SR:i:0
S s2 T LN:i:1 SN:Z:chr1 SO:i:176753158 SR:i:0
Will it be valid rGFA ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A GFA to rGFA tool would be extremely helpful for my use case at the moment. At a minimum, I could use more information about how the SO value is calculated; it's not 100% clear to me, and trying to determine what it should be while parsing the reference human pangenome freeze 1 (which only has intermittent SO tags) has proven to be unexpectedly complex!
I think the reverse is true, a rGFA to GFA conversion tool is (also) severely lacking.
While minigraph is apparently the most efficient and promising pangenome tool at present, the use of rGFA prohibits downstream analysis using the odgi and vg toolkits (at least to my knowledge). Therefore, no SNP calling, odgi pavs calling etc is possible.
@lh3, I'm curious to know , whether we can convert
GFA
torGFA
? . As per rGFA format, we need to maintain 3 additional information along with each segment lines (S
). So,Assuming we have
GFA
with segments links;can't we just add ;
Will it be valid
rGFA
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: