You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note 2: Before seeing the new PICSimLab update with greater support for other uC, STM32, ESP32, W5500, and also for Linux (which interested me more), I already suggested that Wowki add the PIC18F87J60, but they have no knowledge of PIC, and are focused on making a profit before making samples available.
Technically adding the PIC18F87J60 to PICSimLab is not very complicated and I can implement it. But implementing the ethernet controller would require more time, which I currently don't have available.
PICSimLab is my hobby, Wokwi is Uri's source of income. If Wokwi were open source it would be easier to collaborate directly, but I understand Uri's position.
Hello,
I would like to suggest that it might be useful to simulate a PIC18F87J60 version.
The PIC18F87J60 (and others perhaps) has a very low cell endurance (100-1k) and could be a major concern for firmware development on this IC.
Note: On the official website of the PIC18F87J60 the documents that appear are from the PIC18F97J60.
Reference:
Datasheet page 441
http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc/39762f.pdf
Note 2: Before seeing the new PICSimLab update with greater support for other uC, STM32, ESP32, W5500, and also for Linux (which interested me more), I already suggested that Wowki add the PIC18F87J60, but they have no knowledge of PIC, and are focused on making a profit before making samples available.
wokwi/wokwi-features#755
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: