Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve coverage of anonymous traversals. #265

Open
krlawrence opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Improve coverage of anonymous traversals. #265

krlawrence opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@krlawrence
Copy link
Owner

Anonymous traversals are only mentioned five times in the fist edition and in at least one case not described quite accurately. They are described as not spawning from V or E which can be misleading and is also not quite accurate.

In general for the second edition the discussion of anonymous traversals should be expanded and improved.

@krlawrence krlawrence added this to New issues in Planning via automation Oct 6, 2023
@krlawrence krlawrence moved this from New issues to Medium Priority in Planning Oct 8, 2023
spmallette added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2023
The anonymous traversal source with() syntax is in 4.x now and is a bit more streamlined than what was there before. There may yet be some spots that were missed, but most should be covered. This also covers a lot of Graph API removal. #265 #259
spmallette added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2023
The anonymous traversal source with() syntax is in 4.x now and is a bit more streamlined than what was there before. There may yet be some spots that were missed, but most should be covered. This also covers a lot of Graph API removal. #265 #259
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Planning
  
Medium Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant