Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The speed of GeoserverTerrainProvider vs Cesium Terrain Format #43

Open
DeZhao-Zhang opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

The speed of GeoserverTerrainProvider vs Cesium Terrain Format #43

DeZhao-Zhang opened this issue Mar 23, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@DeZhao-Zhang
Copy link

At first, say thanks for author. I have a question, the speed of using GeoserverTerrainProvider, will be slow than using cesium terrain format such as heightmap or quantized mesh?
@kaktus40
Copy link
Owner

Hello, GeoserverTerrainProvider uses heightmap tiles to connect to cesium

@DeZhao-Zhang
Copy link
Author

Hello, GeoserverTerrainProvider uses heightmap tiles to connect to cesium

But the time of transform it to heightmap, will make it slower or can just ignore?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@kaktus40 @DeZhao-Zhang