Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Still relevant? #4

Open
jaredmoody opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Still relevant? #4

jaredmoody opened this issue Dec 10, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@jaredmoody
Copy link

馃憢

Given that there's not much activity on this gem I'm wondering if the approach is still relevant? Does it turn out in practice that it's most often worth it to just always eager load (or the reverse, ignore the n+1's) because there's not much to gain in most cases? Or is this gem just feature complete?

I was looking for anyone writing about the tradeoffs of eager loading (or not) with russian doll caching and this gem and your blog post about it are all I've found so far on this topic of dealing with n+1's with russian doll caching, so I'm curious.

Thanks!

@justinweiss
Copy link
Owner

Yep, the approach should still be relevant. The gem is extremely simple, so there shouldn't be much to add.

In the past few years, I haven't worked on websites that have a big public-facing component, which is where I find heavy russian doll caching most useful, so I haven't kept up with any changes that might be necessary -- but I also haven't heard of anything that still needs to be done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants