Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Map variables across forms #23

Open
bcipolli opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Map variables across forms #23

bcipolli opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@bcipolli
Copy link

Currently, these tools aim to map related variables across schema versions of a form. It would be great to have a meaningful way to map related variables across forms.

for example, total contributions is in both the 990 and 990 EZ (totcntrbs, totcntrbgfts), would be great to have a mapping somewhere that combines these into a single variable.

Could be done as a different model or other means. Happy to think through if this makes sense to do and, if it does, how to do it.

@jsfenfen
Copy link
Owner

Hey @bcipolli thanks for noting this. I definitely agree that this should be done, and have some thoughts, but the short version is this: if a "correct" set of names existed--one that used the same name across forms--it could be added as an extra column in variables.csv.

've contributed a little to the master concordance file -- which is attempting to do this--and my hope is to cross-reference it with irsx via xpaths, but haven't done much on this lately (and am pretty jammed up on time until early next year).

@bcipolli
Copy link
Author

@jsfenfen That's great. I think your suggestion is:

  • Tool this project up to reference the master concordance file
  • Leverage cross mappings that appear there with a new column in variables.
  • focus contributing mappings there, as we come across them.

Is that correct? if so, may be something we could contribute.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants