We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not sure if this is a bug or not, but it should be documented. It causes a problem for molnsutil, which generates negative seed bases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Noted, this will be documented. I believe this is true of StochKit2 as well?
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Andreas Hellander notifications@github.com wrote:
Not sure if this is a bug or not, but it should be documented. It causes a problem for molnsutil, which generates negative seed bases. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #13.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #13.
John H. Abel PhD Candidate, Systems Biology Harvard University Email: j jha@engr.ucsb.eduohnhabel@g.harvard.edu Tel: (401)787-4253
Sorry, something went wrong.
I assume the problem is really StochKit. Negative I could live with, but now it doesn't seem to support 64-bit integers. This is annoying.
I can reflect the seed_base in molnsutil to make it positive (@briandrawert, right??) but I will handle the 64-bit issue in Gillespy instead.
This is fixed in the outstanding PR
No branches or pull requests
Not sure if this is a bug or not, but it should be documented. It causes a problem for molnsutil, which generates negative seed bases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: