Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Quarkus 3.6 compatibility #907

Closed
ShiboTanany opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[BUG] Quarkus 3.6 compatibility #907

ShiboTanany opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@ShiboTanany
Copy link
Contributor

JobRunr Version

6.3.3

JDK Version

OpenJDK 17

Your SQL / NoSQL database

H2

What happened?

Exception thrown after adding @Recurring
No such method which is JobScheduler scheduler = container.instance(JobScheduler.class);
in JobRunrRecurringJobRecorder

How to reproduce?

   BackgroundJob.enqueue(() -> service.helpMe());

Relevant log output

No response

@ShiboTanany ShiboTanany changed the title [BUG] fix integration to quarkus v 3.6.4 [BUG] fix integration to quarkus v 3.6.4 after container.instance deprecated Jan 2, 2024
@rdehuyss
Copy link
Contributor

rdehuyss commented Jan 2, 2024

As Quarkus is not following semver releases, we are unable to fix this in JobRunr v6. This is already fixed in JobRunr v7.

@rdehuyss rdehuyss closed this as completed Jan 2, 2024
@ShiboTanany
Copy link
Contributor Author

thanks for replying, when we are expecting to release v7?
I would like to share my passion to join as a contributor if possible

@rdehuyss
Copy link
Contributor

rdehuyss commented Jan 2, 2024

See also the Quarkus Zulip Chat where I've voiced my concern related to this.

JobRunr v7 will be released somewhere in Q1 (when it's finished 😄 ).

@rdehuyss rdehuyss changed the title [BUG] fix integration to quarkus v 3.6.4 after container.instance deprecated [BUG] Quarkus 3.6 compatibility Jan 2, 2024
@rdehuyss rdehuyss pinned this issue Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants