Exploring the Coexistence of Istio and the Gateway API #49971
-
Certainly! Here's the revised full text with a suitable title: Title: Exploring the Coexistence of Istio and the Gateway API Hello everyone, After using Istio extensively in our production environment, and we're pretty comfortable with it in our live setups. But we're also keen on staying updated with Kubernetes improvements, particularly the Gateway API as the successor to legacy ingress solutions. As per k8s the documentation, it's clear that And as per Istio docs, while the Gateway API offers a rich set of routing functionalities, it's important to note that it doesn't cover 100% of Istio's feature set. Therefore, we're seeking guidance on how Istio and the Gateway API can collaborate effectively. Are there any best practices or resources we should be aware of? Any insights or pointers on achieving smooth integration between Istio and the Gateway API would be greatly appreciated! Can they co-exist or we should choose one. Thank you in advance for your assistance. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Currently Istio offers both. You could use both together in one cluster, though it would likely cause confusion (for humans -- the code handles it fine). If you do mix, they need to be against different deployments, though. For new users, if the feature set of GW API is sufficient I would recommend that. But Istio APIs will stay around as well |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Currently Istio offers both. You could use both together in one cluster, though it would likely cause confusion (for humans -- the code handles it fine). If you do mix, they need to be against different deployments, though.
For new users, if the feature set of GW API is sufficient I would recommend that. But Istio APIs will stay around as well