Year in paper titles would be great

[Crashtime]

Hello, thank you for constructing and maintaining this, our field needs it!

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles? I can add the years my self for what is there already.

Cheers

[matthewfeickert]

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles?

I'm -1 on this at the moment as I don't think this really adds much value in general and just adds in more metadata to something that is meant to be a simple listing and not a replication and not another database — we have INSPIRE for that.

If this was going to be implimented it would make more sense to revamp the project as a proper generated website and have this information just get grabbed from the INSPIRE API.

Can you elaborate on why you want the paper years in the title?

[Crashtime]

I understand! Thanks for the effort! It would be to be able to understand directly how recent the publications are. I am not a great website builder but I can write the code to get the info from the inspire api. Cheers, João Pedro de Arruda Gonçalves Matthew Feickert ***@***.***> escreveu no dia sábado, 9/07/2022 à(s) 14:21:

…

Would it be possible to include the year of the paper in the titles? I'm -1 on this at the moment as I don't think this really adds much value in general and just adds in more metadata to something that is meant to be a simple listing and not a replication and not another database — we have INSPIRE for that. If this was going to be implimented it would make more sense to revamp the project as a proper generated website and have this information just get grabbed from the INSPIRE API. Can you elaborate on why you want the paper years in the title? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#112 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUTGDD6BLHXZKX32X2TVTF4GJANCNFSM53DDWWCQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[bnachman]

I would be in favor of adding this, as I think it is nice to know the timescale. The papers are supposed to be ordered in time, but it can be nice to know how old certain papers are. @Crashtime would you be able to add this? I think it should be easy to grab from the existing metadata. We don't have to be super precise about arXiv date versus published date.

[Crashtime]

Thanks Ben! The distribution in time could be useful to see even if the papers are in chronological order. I can play around with the API and add this over this week. I would use the arxiv date if you agree.

…

On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, 00:22 Ben Nachman, ***@***.***> wrote: I would be in favor of adding this, as I think it is nice to know the timescale. The papers are supposed to be ordered in time, but it can be nice to know how old certain papers are. @Crashtime <https://github.com/Crashtime> would you be able to add this? I think it should be easy to grab from the existing metadata. We don't have to be super precise about arXiv date versus published date. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#112 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUQTPZAK6QVB4FTB5MLVTICSNANCNFSM53DDWWCQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[bnachman]

Great, thanks! arXiv date makes sense to me.

[Crashtime]

Hello, I have made some alterations to the make_md.py file and was able to include the year, without the need for the arxiv API. I created a new branch and would like to push it to the repo and follow with a merge request, is this possible? Cheers, João Pedro de Arruda Gonçalves Ben Nachman ***@***.***> escreveu no dia segunda, 11/07/2022 à(s) 00:59:

…

Great, thanks! arXiv date makes sense to me. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#112 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACRDMUSFIJGCWTAQE2RO2SLVTNPWPANCNFSM53DDWWCQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[ramonpeter]

Hi @Crashtime,

I think you never send a PR, did you?
Can you make the PR as explained in CONTRIBUTING.md? I can review it then.
Thanks