One more or up to three more steps in Imba clever syntax

[madmaniak]

1. I just realised there's redundant information about what is style attribute and html/imba attribute.
   We write:

<div[h:20rem w:10rem] attribute=some_data>

But we could write:

<div h:20rem w:10rem attribute=some_data>

# or

<div attribute=some_data h:20rem w:10rem>

# or even

<div h:20rem attribute=some_data w:10rem>

As parser can recognise what is for style and what is another by : and = characters.

2. I would propose an alias for tag imba-component and allow simply:

<imba-component>

# as an equivalent of

tag imba-component
  <self>

Parser can understand it's a tag declaration because there's no indentation. It could lead to super clean - especially small - files which look just like html.

3. Both upper proposals are backwards compatible and following not. I'd like to remind one feature of Imba1 which was very clean passing data to the component, like this:

<some-component[person]>

# and then object was accessed inside some-component through `data` like this:

data.name

I was using it a lot and it is great for decorating object - which for example came straight from backend - with a visual part.
Considering that you like 1) proposal it would be possible to reintroduce that feature.
I would change data into some symbol, for example @ so we could write something like this:

tag person-component
  <self>
    <div> @name 
    <div> @surname

# and use it

<person-component[person]>

Pick any or none as you like.