Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion for Intensity Measurements and Analyze Regions commands #69

Open
LPUoO opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion for Intensity Measurements and Analyze Regions commands #69

LPUoO opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@LPUoO
Copy link

LPUoO commented May 12, 2022

Hi @dlegland 👋

I just wanted to suggest the addition of an optional results column with the name of the input image and the name of the label map (similar to Display label in Analyze › Set Measurements...) in MorphoLibJ › Analyze › Intensity Measurements 2D/3D.

Same for the name of the label map when using MorphoLibJ › Analyze › Analyze Regions.

Also, if the names of the input images are present in the results then the ability of adding new results to an existing table (rather than creating a new one) might be useful.

This would help users process the results when analysing multiple images.

Thanks a lot
🙇

@dlegland
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
yes, this coud be a useful option!
I plan (for a long time...) to refactor these plugin, so this can be taken into account.

however I am not totally sure this can be easily done. From what I remember, ImageJ ResultsTable allow only numeric values, and adding names is possible only in the first column :(
But maybe it is possible to provide a pattern for combining image name and label value to populate first column...

@dlegland dlegland self-assigned this May 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants