Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for GVX Format Files #224

Open
BatchelorJ opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Support for GVX Format Files #224

BatchelorJ opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
feature new Request a new feature or function priority 4 (nice-not-necessary) Good idea but unlikely to be delivered in the near future

Comments

@BatchelorJ
Copy link
Collaborator

Brief description
An enhancement to support input and/or output of GNSS baseline data compliant with the GVX file format.

Background
The US National Geodetic Survey has developed the GVX format to provide a standard file format for exchanging GNSS vectors derived from varying GNSS survey methods and manufacturer hardware. This standard has now been adopted by industry-standard GNSS baseline processing software including Trimble Business Centre (v5.60 and later) and Leica Infinity (v4.0 and later).

Currently, DynAdjust users rely on scripts to convert data from GNSS baseline processing software into DynaML format before being able to import GNSS baselines into DynAdjust. Implementing support for the GVX format will enable simpler importing and adjustment of GNSS data from industry-standard GNSS processing software.

Further information on the GVX format is available below:

GVX Documentation
Example file
GVX Schema

Basic requirements
Ability to import relevant GNSS baseline data and metadata parameters from GVX format files and map to DynAdjust GNSS baseline data model

Priority
Feature New

@BatchelorJ BatchelorJ added feature new Request a new feature or function priority 4 (nice-not-necessary) Good idea but unlikely to be delivered in the near future labels Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature new Request a new feature or function priority 4 (nice-not-necessary) Good idea but unlikely to be delivered in the near future
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant